“…In this study, 2.7470.023 was adopted for pK f1 , which was estimated based on potentiometric titration (Sjo¨berg, 1998). Meanwhile, since the used FITEQL cannot fit the bulk deposition observed in the acidic supernatant during the hydroxide titration, a supposed reaction to simulate the interactions between aluminum species and silicic acid during the hydroxide titration was further introduced, where K f2 represents the formation constant for the produced complex.…”