2002
DOI: 10.1023/a:1015861610226
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Untitled

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data were further filtered to retain markers with an amplification rate of >80% and to exclude co-segregating markers. Markers showing segregation distortion were excluded in JoinMap Version 5 (Van Ooijen, 2018), unless clustered together with the correct Morex genome assembly order, under the assumption of biological significance which is common in wide crosses (Zamir & Tadmor, 1986), or that they are linked to traits affecting regeneration of plantlets following microspore-culture (Sayed et al, 2002). Markers were grouped into linkage groups by their independence LOD in JoinMap Version 5 and ordered within each linkage group by the maximum likelihood algorithm with the default parameters.…”
Section: Genetic Map Construction and Genetic Mapping Of Barley Powdery Mildew Resistance Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data were further filtered to retain markers with an amplification rate of >80% and to exclude co-segregating markers. Markers showing segregation distortion were excluded in JoinMap Version 5 (Van Ooijen, 2018), unless clustered together with the correct Morex genome assembly order, under the assumption of biological significance which is common in wide crosses (Zamir & Tadmor, 1986), or that they are linked to traits affecting regeneration of plantlets following microspore-culture (Sayed et al, 2002). Markers were grouped into linkage groups by their independence LOD in JoinMap Version 5 and ordered within each linkage group by the maximum likelihood algorithm with the default parameters.…”
Section: Genetic Map Construction and Genetic Mapping Of Barley Powdery Mildew Resistance Locimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The usual way to assess segregation distortion for marker data is by χ 2 tests (Haitham et al, 2002;Lu et al, 2002;Ruiz and Asins, 2003). In the current study, Ninety three (82.3%) primers showed 1:1 disomic segregation pattern and twenty marker alleles (17.69%) showed deviations from Mendelian segregation pattern.…”
Section: Construction Of Genetic Linkage Map and Qtl Mappingmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Nonetheless as noticed earlier, in the present study, some of the number of positives generated from the BC 1 F 1 cross from CSIR/CRI-ATS06 deviated from the typical Mendelian pattern of segregation, probably due to selfed seeds, which might have resulted in fewer number of positive plants in that backcross. According to Sayed et al (2002) even though markers will generally segregate in a Mendelian manner, distorted segregation ratios may be encountered. Identification of positives for alc gene in BC 1 F 1 generation through phenotypic screening is very difficult and is time consuming.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%