1994
DOI: 10.1080/00927879408825134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost complete intersection monomial curves inA4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, n − 1. Hence, by (11), v = u, which completes the proof that φ is injective. Since it is finite, it is proper.…”
Section: Some Cohomological Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…, n − 1. Hence, by (11), v = u, which completes the proof that φ is injective. Since it is finite, it is proper.…”
Section: Some Cohomological Resultsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…If N = 4 and if I (V ) is an almost complete intersection, we can apply Theorem 3.1 and show that it is a set-theoretic complete intersection [8]. We will give another example of set-theoretic complete intersection monomial curve initially proved in [18].…”
Section: Monomial Curve Casementioning
confidence: 96%
“…In this case, if the defining ideal of C is generated by N − 1 binomials up to radical, then it turns out to be a complete intersection [20]. There are number of results in which the monomial curves are set-theoretic complete intersections [2,4,5,7,8,12,13,18,19,21], but almost all of them find N − 2 binomials and one polynomial which define the monomial curves set-theoretically. So, in this article, we ask under what conditions there are N − 2 binomials and one polynomial which define a monomial curve set-theoretically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If (X 1 , X 2 , X 3 ) is a lattice divisor of I (W 3 ), then, by Lemma 3 ) is a set-theoretic complete intersection, hence so is I (V ). (Step 2) Assume that I (V ) is an almost complete intersection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%