2019
DOI: 10.1063/1.5115535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Almost pinning-free bismuth/Ge and /Si interfaces

Abstract: In this work, we investigated the band alignment at bismuth (Bi)/germanium (Ge) and Bi/silicon (Si) interfaces to understand the mechanism of strong Fermi level pinning (FLP) at element metal/Ge and/Si interfaces. Bi/Ge and/Si interfaces exhibit almost ideal alignment deviating from the trend of strong FLP at element metal/Ge and/Si interfaces. This result suggests that the strong FLP at element metal/Ge and/Si interfaces is mainly caused by the metal-induced gap states (MIGS) in case of the free electron dens… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Shen et al reported the low contact resistance between semimetal bismuth and monolayer MoS 2 . Bismuth is a semimetal that has a very low density of states around E F , which provides weak pinning of its SBHs on Bi or similar Sb when contacting to 2D materials or Si. , However, Bi has a relatively lower melting point of only 271 °C, thus Bi contacts will melt during back-end-of-line (BEOL) processing. Sb with a higher melting point of 631 °C is able to survive BEOL temperature …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Shen et al reported the low contact resistance between semimetal bismuth and monolayer MoS 2 . Bismuth is a semimetal that has a very low density of states around E F , which provides weak pinning of its SBHs on Bi or similar Sb when contacting to 2D materials or Si. , However, Bi has a relatively lower melting point of only 271 °C, thus Bi contacts will melt during back-end-of-line (BEOL) processing. Sb with a higher melting point of 631 °C is able to survive BEOL temperature …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31] To overcome the difficulty in reproducibility and in the deterministic definition of the metal phase in metal-Si/Ge heterostructures, [32] contacts composed of singleelement metals are a highly rewarding strategy for diverse next-generation nanoelectronic, optoelectronic, and quantum devices [33][34][35][36] as well as for providing strategies for pinning-free contacts as shown recently with Bi/Si and Bi/Ge contact systems. [17] Despite a vast variety of different nanoelectronic, [37,38] optoelectronic, [39,40] and superconductor-semiconductor hybrid devices [41][42][43] based on Si 1−x Ge x layers of various compositions, a systematic investigation of the structural and electronic properties of Al-Si 1−x Ge x heterostructures obtained from a thermally induced Al-Si 1−x Ge x exchange is still not available. In this respect, the work at hand discusses the Si 1−x Ge x compositiondependent properties of SBFETs based on monolithic and single-crystalline heterostructures with abrupt and flat junctions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately, the use of Bismuth contacts having a comparatively low electron density, have successfully shown to minimize pinning effects in Si and Ge. [ 17 ] Nevertheless, as dimensions of semiconductor devices scale down, precise dopant control and thus contact properties get affected by statistical variability in dopant concentration. [ 18 ] Additionally, surface depletion effects and even the dielectric mismatch between the semiconductor region and the surrounding insulator induce severe problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This heterojunction is notable because Sb is a semimetal that has a very low density of states (DOS) around EF. Experimentally, Bi contacts on Ge were found to be ohmic [24], and this is partly attributed to the low DOS at EF which provides only weak pinning of metal SBHs on Bi or Sb, as shown in Fig. 10(a).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the MIGS model fails to explain the orientation dependence of SBHs for epitaxial NiSi2/Si interfaces [15,16] or for germanide/Ge interfaces [17], the termination dependence of (Sc, Er)As /GaAs interfaces [18] or the weak pinning at the Bi/Si interfaces [24,25]. These various interfaces all show weaker FLP (larger S) and an orientation dependence of SBHs [15][16][17][18], which cannot be described by the basic MIGS model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%