2018
DOI: 10.1080/13569325.2018.1447447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alongside Violence: Everyday Survival in Chocó, Colombia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Notably, it was by engaging with people directly and expressing our interest in a rounded and more complex picture of these neighbourhoods that we tried to avoid the justifiable suspicion of researchers briefly visiting such areas to produce either a romanticised report of the supposed transformation of the cities, or a crude retelling of crime, violence and poverty. Such an approach risks reproducing harmful territorial stigma and fails to consider the complexities of living alongside violence, whereby survival is about negotiation rather than actively opposing or resisting violence (Alape 2006; Lizarazo 2018). While there are always limits to how well an ethnographer can understand the everyday dynamics of a particular place that they are not deeply rooted to, we hope to show that close dialogue with participants can fill those gaps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Notably, it was by engaging with people directly and expressing our interest in a rounded and more complex picture of these neighbourhoods that we tried to avoid the justifiable suspicion of researchers briefly visiting such areas to produce either a romanticised report of the supposed transformation of the cities, or a crude retelling of crime, violence and poverty. Such an approach risks reproducing harmful territorial stigma and fails to consider the complexities of living alongside violence, whereby survival is about negotiation rather than actively opposing or resisting violence (Alape 2006; Lizarazo 2018). While there are always limits to how well an ethnographer can understand the everyday dynamics of a particular place that they are not deeply rooted to, we hope to show that close dialogue with participants can fill those gaps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the warnings we had been issued indicated the symbolic placement of such neighbourhoods within persistently fragmented cities despite decades of transformation policy. More importantly, these contradictions were constantly negotiated by creative organisations and residents within these neighbourhoods, as they tried to find a balance between celebrating a positive cultural identity while 'living alongside' (Lizarazo 2018) the everyday violence that continues and is at risk of being obscured by the very same transformation policies that are so lauded in the press.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, these interventions are based on creating and imposing categories of identification that cannot grasp the conditions of the populations in need of help (Feldman, 2007). Their bureaucratic procedures depend on donor funding and priorities that generally do not correspond to the needs of the populations they seek to benefit (Lizarazo, 2018). Moreover, local communities are not passive receivers of aid; while subjects of humanitarian concern may strategically conform to a portrait that depicts them as innocent, passive, and apolitical (Ticktin, 2011), knowing that it will have an impact on public opinion, they also disrupt such representations in their ordinary everyday political practices (Das, 2015).…”
Section: Ethical Disconcertmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, anthropology has been concerned with state‐sponsored (Centro Nacional de Memoria Histórica, 2017; Grupo de Memoria Histórica, 2013) and community efforts of historical archive‐making, bringing attention to how bodies provide material and symbolic testimonies of war atrocities (Blair Trujillo, 2005; Cabrera, 2009; Lizarazo, 2022; Quiceno Toro and Villamizar Gelves, 2020). We are also in dialogue with environmental anthropologists and feminist geographers whose research interrogates how war transpires and is sustained in the country (Berman‐Arévalo and Ojeda, 2020; Lizarazo, 2018; Oslender, 2008). In these works, rurality is not only configured by atrocious acts but also by seemingly unremarkable everyday expressions of political violence.…”
Section: Explosivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%