2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00203-019-01790-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alterations of salivary microbial community associated with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overall objective of this study was to determine which oral sites may harbor S. noxia, including saliva and the gingival crevice, but also additional sites, such as the dorsum of the tongue, lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisor, and buccal surface of the maxillary molars. The results of this study were successful in demonstrating that this organism may be detectable most often from samples of unstimulated saliva, comparable to findings reported from other studies [25,26]. These results also support previous reports from this group regarding the oral prevalence of this organism, based upon molecular screening of salivary samples [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The overall objective of this study was to determine which oral sites may harbor S. noxia, including saliva and the gingival crevice, but also additional sites, such as the dorsum of the tongue, lingual surfaces of the mandibular incisor, and buccal surface of the maxillary molars. The results of this study were successful in demonstrating that this organism may be detectable most often from samples of unstimulated saliva, comparable to findings reported from other studies [25,26]. These results also support previous reports from this group regarding the oral prevalence of this organism, based upon molecular screening of salivary samples [20,21].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The characteristics of the selected studies are described in detail in Table 1 . Of the twenty-six studies, ten were from the United States of America [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], four were from China [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], three were from Taiwan [ 7 , 26 , 27 ], two were from India [ 28 , 29 ], and others were from Yemen [ 30 ], Malaysia [ 31 ], Australia [ 32 ], Japan [ 33 , 34 ], Sri Lanka [ 35 ], and New Zealand [ 36 ]. The study design for all the studies was cross-sectional, except for one which employed a prospective methodology [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of the studies included both genders as the subjects except two studies which were restricted to male subjects only [ 12 , 35 ]. Other associated factors such as cigarette smoking, betel quid chewing, and alcohol use, HPV, etc., were investigated in fifteen of the selected studies [ 7 , 12 , 20 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34 , 35 ]. The ability to compare or incorporate the results of individual studies was restricted by the extensive differences in various aspects of the studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saliva is a biological fluid with features such as ease of sampling, cost-effectiveness, and non-invasiveness that make it a perfect diagnostic specimen, highlighting the importance of developing a method for early detection of OSCC based on validated salivary biomarkers [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Several well-designed studies recently reported on potential detection methods for oral cancer, suggesting analysis of salivary RNA and proteins [ 19 , 20 ], microRNAs [ 21 , 22 ], metabolites [ 23 , 24 ], glycoprotein [ 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], and the microbiome [ 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. However, as yet, no suitable biomarkers are regularly used in clinical practice for the management of oral cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%