2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.01.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altered neural processing of reward and punishment in adolescents with Major Depressive Disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Results find that blunted responses in adolescents is associated with illness onset over time and predictions of more depression symptoms [75]. A recent study also examining event related potentials for monetary reward and punishment in adolescent depression, reported delayed neural responses to reward cues and shorter latencies for reward vs. punishment outcomes, compared to controls [76]. Taken together, these results are therefore consistent with the adult depression literature of altered neural responses to reward in depression, but as with other studies in this review these studies did not report on any relationship between their data and clinical measures of anhedonia, which makes it difficult to know if they are reward specific deficits or in fact driven by other symptoms like anxiety.…”
Section: Anhedonia and Reward Processing In Adolescent Mdd-neural Stumentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Results find that blunted responses in adolescents is associated with illness onset over time and predictions of more depression symptoms [75]. A recent study also examining event related potentials for monetary reward and punishment in adolescent depression, reported delayed neural responses to reward cues and shorter latencies for reward vs. punishment outcomes, compared to controls [76]. Taken together, these results are therefore consistent with the adult depression literature of altered neural responses to reward in depression, but as with other studies in this review these studies did not report on any relationship between their data and clinical measures of anhedonia, which makes it difficult to know if they are reward specific deficits or in fact driven by other symptoms like anxiety.…”
Section: Anhedonia and Reward Processing In Adolescent Mdd-neural Stumentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Moreover, the present study only compared the alterations of indicators before and after occipital rTMS combined with pharmacotherapy in treatment courses; however, it is unknown when the alterations happened. Future ERP studies provide a precise chronological delineation of alterations in the temporal dynamics underlying pre-attentive processing ( Landes et al, 2018 ). Furthermore, we cannot investigate the neuroimaging mechanism of pre-attentive processing in MDD with occipital rTMS.…”
Section: Limitations and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the MID task has been used extensively to study dysfunctional reward processing in populations with substance use disorders (Balodis & Potenza, 2015), it has also been incorporated into other studies of neurodevelopment and broader psychopathology. Various versions of the MID task have been used to investigate reward‐related changes as a function of age (Bjork et al., 2010; Dhingra et al., 2019; Heitzeg et al., 2014), social versus nonsocial rewards (Schwartz et al., 2019), psychosocial characteristics of impulsivity and sensation seeking (Büchel et al., 2017; Cao et al., 2019; Joseph et al., 2016), early adversity (Boecker et al., 2014; Gonzalez et al., 2016), substance use (Aloi et al., 2019; Cope et al., 2019; Heitzeg et al., 2014; Karoly et al., 2015; Nestor et al., 2019; Sauder et al., 2016; Swartz et al., 2019), depression (Chan et al., 2016; Colich et al., 2017; Landes et al., 2018; Mori et al., 2016), and other psychiatric symptoms (Bourque et al., 2017; Lancaster et al., 2016; Maresh et al., 2019; Mikita et al., 2016; Papanastasiou et al., 2018; von Rhein et al., 2015; Stevens et al., 2018; Urošević et al., 2016; Veroude et al., 2016; Xu et al., 2017). Across these studies, a wide range of brain‐behavior effects are reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%