1968
DOI: 10.1037/h0025677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative bases for choice in probabilistic discrimination.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1987
1987

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Differential maximizing came next with the best fit for 20 per cent of the subjects. Essentially similar results were obtained in a study by Summers (1968).…”
Section: I55supporting
confidence: 89%
“…Differential maximizing came next with the best fit for 20 per cent of the subjects. Essentially similar results were obtained in a study by Summers (1968).…”
Section: I55supporting
confidence: 89%
“…The P(Ai|T 2 ) statistic decreased with increases in j3. Others (Summers, 1968) have suggested that the relative contrast of event frequencies on cue trials with overall TT may have determined the subjects' responding in Shaffer's study.…”
Section: Proportion Of 7\ Trials J3mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Two cues were used to test Atkinson's (1958) observing response model (e.g., Atkinson, 1961;Myers & Cruse, 1968) and to relate S's "strategy" to the validity of the cue (e.g., Bjorkman, 1967Bjorkman, , 1969Summers, 1968). Schipper (1967) used three cues to test Brunswik's (1939) statement that extreme probabilities (i.e., .00 and 1.00) are qualitatively different in a probability learning situation from probabilities less extreme (e.g., .10 and 0.90).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there is some evidence that performing several independent probability learning tasks does result in overshooting (e.g., Erickson, 1966;Summers, 1968), other results indicate that the relationship is more complex. Some results (e.g., Kroll, 1967;Myers & Cruse, 1968) suggest that overshooting is more likely when one of the tasks has an event probability near 1.0 or .0; i.e., 6" is more likely to overshoot to Q, where P(^ Q) might equal .70, if P(E 1 |C 2 ) is .9 or .1 than if P(E t |C 2 ) is .5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%