Five groups of 5s performed four simultaneous probability learning tasks under either speed or accuracy instructions, each having one task with the probability of one of two alternative events (Ei) given a cue (Ci) equal to .70. Compared with a single task, P(Ei)=:.70, control, the multiple task resulted in more overshooting when P(Ei)=.70, less when P(Ei) < .70. It was suggested that the multiple task disrupts sequential information, resulting in more overshooting, but that this effect is counteracted by cue generalization when P(Ei) (Ai|Ci), where Ai is the prediction of EL