Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
In this chapter, some alternative, "ferroic", solid-state energy conversion technologies are presented. These are the electrocaloric (pyroelectric), the barocaloric and the elastocaloric energy conversions. In their nature, they are analogous to magnetocaloric energy conversion; however, different external influences are needed to initialize the caloric effect. In the case of electrocaloric energy conversion, this is related to a change in the electric field; in the case of barocalorics, to a change in the hydrostatic pressure and in the case of elastocaloric energy conversion, to a change in the mechanical stress. Each group, to some extent, possesses possible advantages as well as some disadvantages in comparison with magnetocaloric energy conversion. However, since all three alternative solid-state energy conversion technologies are at an early stage of development, it is not yet reasonable to compare them with magnetocaloric energy conversion. It is only time and further research that will show the full potential of these alternative solid-state energy conversion technologies.This chapter is divided into three sections. In each section, the physical principle behind the discussed ferroic effect will be presented and an overview of existing materials with their physical properties will be made. Furthermore, different possibilities for designing an energy conversion device using these materials will be reviewed (especially for electrocalorics). However, since the technology based on these three effects is at an early stage of development, only a few prototypes of energy conversion devices have been presented. Electrocaloric and Pyroelectric Energy ConversionIn this subsection, the electrocaloric and pyroelectric energy conversions are presented and discussed. In general, the electrocaloric energy conversion stands for the heat pumping processes (or refrigeration), whereas the pyroelectric energy conversion stands for the power generation.The underlying mechanism of the electrocaloric energy conversion is the so-called electrocaloric effect. The electrocaloric effect is expressed as the temperature change of dielectric materials subjected to a varying electric field. To simplify, as the electrocaloric material is subjected to a positive electric field change the material heats up, yet as the electric field is turned off the opposite occurs and the material cools down. Speaking thermodynamically, the electrocaloric effect is analogue to the magnetocaloric effect, though instead of the magnetic field change an electric field change is required to induce the caloric effect in the material. However, the electrocaloric energy conversion has some potential advantages over the magnetocaloric energy conversion, such as higher power density and higher compactness of the energy conversion devices, no dependence on rare-earth materials, no moving parts of the device, operation of the devices with less vibrations, silent operation, etc. Nevertheless, the area of the electrocaloric energy conversion only recently attracted m...
In this chapter, some alternative, "ferroic", solid-state energy conversion technologies are presented. These are the electrocaloric (pyroelectric), the barocaloric and the elastocaloric energy conversions. In their nature, they are analogous to magnetocaloric energy conversion; however, different external influences are needed to initialize the caloric effect. In the case of electrocaloric energy conversion, this is related to a change in the electric field; in the case of barocalorics, to a change in the hydrostatic pressure and in the case of elastocaloric energy conversion, to a change in the mechanical stress. Each group, to some extent, possesses possible advantages as well as some disadvantages in comparison with magnetocaloric energy conversion. However, since all three alternative solid-state energy conversion technologies are at an early stage of development, it is not yet reasonable to compare them with magnetocaloric energy conversion. It is only time and further research that will show the full potential of these alternative solid-state energy conversion technologies.This chapter is divided into three sections. In each section, the physical principle behind the discussed ferroic effect will be presented and an overview of existing materials with their physical properties will be made. Furthermore, different possibilities for designing an energy conversion device using these materials will be reviewed (especially for electrocalorics). However, since the technology based on these three effects is at an early stage of development, only a few prototypes of energy conversion devices have been presented. Electrocaloric and Pyroelectric Energy ConversionIn this subsection, the electrocaloric and pyroelectric energy conversions are presented and discussed. In general, the electrocaloric energy conversion stands for the heat pumping processes (or refrigeration), whereas the pyroelectric energy conversion stands for the power generation.The underlying mechanism of the electrocaloric energy conversion is the so-called electrocaloric effect. The electrocaloric effect is expressed as the temperature change of dielectric materials subjected to a varying electric field. To simplify, as the electrocaloric material is subjected to a positive electric field change the material heats up, yet as the electric field is turned off the opposite occurs and the material cools down. Speaking thermodynamically, the electrocaloric effect is analogue to the magnetocaloric effect, though instead of the magnetic field change an electric field change is required to induce the caloric effect in the material. However, the electrocaloric energy conversion has some potential advantages over the magnetocaloric energy conversion, such as higher power density and higher compactness of the energy conversion devices, no dependence on rare-earth materials, no moving parts of the device, operation of the devices with less vibrations, silent operation, etc. Nevertheless, the area of the electrocaloric energy conversion only recently attracted m...
The analytical solution is reported for one-dimensional (1D) dynamic conduction heat transfer within a multilayer system that is the typical structure of electrocaloric devices. Here, the multilayer structure of typical electrocaloric devices is simplified as four layers in which two layers of electrocaloric materials (ECMs) are sandwiched between two semi-infinite bodies representing the thermal sink and source. The temperature of electrocaloric layers can be instantaneously changed by external electric field to establish the initial temperature profile. The analytical solution includes the temperatures in four bodies as a function of both time and location and heat flux through each of the three interfaces as a function of time. Each of these analytical solutions includes five infinite series. It is proved that each of these series is convergent so that the sum of each series can be calculated using the first [Formula: see text] terms of the series. The formula for calculating the value of [Formula: see text] is presented so that the simulation of an electrocaloric device, such as the temperature distribution and heat transferred from one body to another can be performed. The value of [Formula: see text] is dependent on the thickness of electrocaloric material layers, the time of heat conduction, and thermal properties of the materials used. Based on a case study, it is concluded that the [Formula: see text] is mostly less than 20 and barely reaches more than 70. The application of the analytical solutions for the simulation of real electrocaloric devices is discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.