1986
DOI: 10.1080/02664768600000002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative forms and properties of the score test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of notation, the matrices of explanatory variables are (4a) and (4b) Davidson and MacKinnon (1983), Kiviet (1986), and Bera and McKenzie (1986). In assessing this evidence Davidson and MacKinnon (1993, p. 190) conclude: "Based partly on theory and evidence, then, and partly on the convenience of using the same form of test for Gauss-Newton regressions as would normally be used with genuine regressions, we therefore recommend using the F test .…”
Section: The Gauss-newton Regressionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In terms of notation, the matrices of explanatory variables are (4a) and (4b) Davidson and MacKinnon (1983), Kiviet (1986), and Bera and McKenzie (1986). In assessing this evidence Davidson and MacKinnon (1993, p. 190) conclude: "Based partly on theory and evidence, then, and partly on the convenience of using the same form of test for Gauss-Newton regressions as would normally be used with genuine regressions, we therefore recommend using the F test .…”
Section: The Gauss-newton Regressionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In order to state some results in Section 2 we rely on asymptotic theory. In view of this, we planned Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the empirical level and the power of the test statistics (16)- (19) at a nominal significance level of 5 per cent when testing hypothesis (20). Simulation settings are as follows.…”
Section: Simulation Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Bera and MacKenzie (1986) has argued for the superior small‐sample performance of LM E over LM H and LM G , which has been found to be empirically supported. Also, the superior performance of LM D over LM H and LM G in small samples has been shown in many empirical studies (see Davidson and MacKinnon, 1983, 1984).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%