2007
DOI: 10.1063/1.2761878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative linear-scaling methodology for the second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation calculation based on the divide-and-conquer method

Abstract: A new scheme for obtaining the approximate correlation energy in the divide-and-conquer (DC) method of Yang [Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1438 (1991)] is presented. In this method, the correlation energy of the total system is evaluated by summing up subsystem contributions, which are calculated from subsystem orbitals based on a scheme for partitioning the correlation energy. We applied this method to the second-order Moller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2), which we call DC-MP2. Numerical assessment revealed that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
125
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 149 publications
(126 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
0
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Including the exact exchange as in B3LYP leads a formal scaling as N 4 , whereas including the PT2 term leads to a formal scaling as N 5 , just as for MP2. Linear scaling methods have been developed for MP2 (37)(38)(39) that dramatically accelerate calculations for large molecules, and we expect that these can be used with XYG3. See SI for additional information …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Including the exact exchange as in B3LYP leads a formal scaling as N 4 , whereas including the PT2 term leads to a formal scaling as N 5 , just as for MP2. Linear scaling methods have been developed for MP2 (37)(38)(39) that dramatically accelerate calculations for large molecules, and we expect that these can be used with XYG3. See SI for additional information …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is equivalent to solving the Green function method. 32,33 The DC method for electronic structure calculation, [34][35][36] which divides the total system into subsystems and allocates buffer region for each subsystem, reduced the scaling of computational time to quasilinear. The second formula is expressed as the sum-over-state, as follows:…”
Section: Theoretical Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…395 The first buffer region surrounding each subsystem includes the calculation of the correlation energy, while the second layer buffer only performs a HartreeÀFock calculation. This scheme effectively exploits the local nature of electron correlation and provides additional reductions in the computational effort for correlated calculations.…”
Section: Systematic Fragmentation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%