2011 4th Joint IFIP Wireless and Mobile Networking Conference (WMNC 2011) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/wmnc.2011.6097239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alternative protocols for femtocell backbone security

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8 show additional overhead generated by all HSS schemes over the backhaul when compared to the OSS and the USS. Note the size of each signalling message with consideration of overhead from all layers of protocol stack is approximately 800 bits [28]. The highest backhaul overhead is generated be centralized HSS-TWC scheme and is up to 33.3 kbit/s.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 show additional overhead generated by all HSS schemes over the backhaul when compared to the OSS and the USS. Note the size of each signalling message with consideration of overhead from all layers of protocol stack is approximately 800 bits [28]. The highest backhaul overhead is generated be centralized HSS-TWC scheme and is up to 33.3 kbit/s.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second part of the overhead is an overhead generated by the SCeNBs in order to coordinate their transmission power (labeled in the evaluations as the CaPC signaling overhead). The size of each exchanged message with consideration of overhead from all layers of protocol stack is approximately 800 bits .…”
Section: Simulation Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2). The HeNBs do have connectivity to respective resources (data storages, database servers, and other servers) based on the service offered by the mobile operator [20].…”
Section: B Femtocellsmentioning
confidence: 99%