2021
DOI: 10.20935/al1658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altmetrics: alternative metrics for scientific, technological and innovation evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a predominance of original research articles, reflections, and reviews; in addition, important contributions were foundinbooks,bookchaptersanddoctoraltheses. Several works present a theoretical perspective based on a critical approach to the current system of science evaluation and from Latin American critical theories, focused on the importance of scientific evaluation in the context of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) in Latin America (Goncharuk, 2018;Gómez-Morales, 2018;Faraldo Cabana, 2019;Invernizzi & Davyt, 2019;Beigel, 2020;Salatino & López Ruiz, 2021;Ortiz Núñez, 2021;Neupane et al, 2022;Miguel & González, 2023;Debat, 2023). The need to integrate quantitative and qualitative criteria in STI policies is discussed, and the importance of contextualized scientific evaluation is emphasized, which considers the integration of new metrics and approaches toimprovescientificevaluation.…”
Section: State Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a predominance of original research articles, reflections, and reviews; in addition, important contributions were foundinbooks,bookchaptersanddoctoraltheses. Several works present a theoretical perspective based on a critical approach to the current system of science evaluation and from Latin American critical theories, focused on the importance of scientific evaluation in the context of Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) in Latin America (Goncharuk, 2018;Gómez-Morales, 2018;Faraldo Cabana, 2019;Invernizzi & Davyt, 2019;Beigel, 2020;Salatino & López Ruiz, 2021;Ortiz Núñez, 2021;Neupane et al, 2022;Miguel & González, 2023;Debat, 2023). The need to integrate quantitative and qualitative criteria in STI policies is discussed, and the importance of contextualized scientific evaluation is emphasized, which considers the integration of new metrics and approaches toimprovescientificevaluation.…”
Section: State Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors present a theoretical approach based on the new paradigm of open science, the scientific production democratization and proposals for the integration of altmetrics in the evaluation of science. From this perspective, it is recommended to integrate quantitative and qualitative criteria into Latin American STI policies, which must also be adjusted to local realities and budgets (Tahamtan & Bornmann, 2020;Beigel, 2020;Calisto-Breiding et al, 2021;Ortiz Núñez, 2021;Salatino & Macedo, 2022;Neupane et al, 2022;Debat, 2023). It is argued that Latin America is investing in open access and strengthening scientific diffusion and visibility networks, and that this requires a framework to use new metrics in thescientificresearchevaluation.…”
Section: State Of the Questionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…У роботах зарубіжних науковців розглядаються різні аспекти, проблеми та особливості оцінювання ефективності наукових досліджень і розробок, а також питання організації фінансування за результатами оцінювання [4][5][6]. Серед українських дослідників, які займаються проблемами оцінювання діяльності наукових установ, варто назвати О. Мриглод і С. Назаровця [7], Б. Маліцького [8], В. Рибачука [9] та ін.…”
unclassified
“…Єгоров, І.А. Жукович ковцями різних країн [1][2][3][4][5]. Деяким аспектам оцінювання діяльності окремих учених і наукових установ, пропозиціям щодо удосконалення методології оцінювання присвячені роботи вітчизняних дослідників [6][7][8][9].…”
unclassified