2013
DOI: 10.1080/1364436x.2013.849661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Altruism in adolescents and young adults: validation of an instrument to measure generative altruism with structural equation modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
8

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
16
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, James and Fine found that adolescent participants coded as having a more coherent spirituality or sense of purpose (as opposed to an ambiguous spirituality) scored higher on measures of all six "Cs" of positive youth development (i.e., Competence, Confidence, Character, Connection, Caring/Compassion, and Contribution), with higher scores on the Contribution factor indicating higher levels of generosity [9]. Similarly, Spiewak and Sherrod found that generosity was correlated with religious beliefs, spiritual transcendence, and religious practices in a cross-sectional sample of adolescents and emerging adults [10], and Bussing, Kerksieck, Günther, and Baumann found that spirituality and religiousness were correlated with generative altruism in adolescents and emerging adults [11]. Although these are important contributions to the literature in establishing empirical relations between religion, spirituality, and generosity, they do not address causal processes or the directionality of effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For instance, James and Fine found that adolescent participants coded as having a more coherent spirituality or sense of purpose (as opposed to an ambiguous spirituality) scored higher on measures of all six "Cs" of positive youth development (i.e., Competence, Confidence, Character, Connection, Caring/Compassion, and Contribution), with higher scores on the Contribution factor indicating higher levels of generosity [9]. Similarly, Spiewak and Sherrod found that generosity was correlated with religious beliefs, spiritual transcendence, and religious practices in a cross-sectional sample of adolescents and emerging adults [10], and Bussing, Kerksieck, Günther, and Baumann found that spirituality and religiousness were correlated with generative altruism in adolescents and emerging adults [11]. Although these are important contributions to the literature in establishing empirical relations between religion, spirituality, and generosity, they do not address causal processes or the directionality of effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The variables are created by coding the response items from 0 ("Never") to 3 ("Often"). These statements are borrowed from a previous study on altruism in adolescence (Büssing et al, 2013). The objective of this study was to develop an altruism score, which was constructed using seven questions in total --the four questions presented above plus three additionnal questions.…”
Section: Social Altruismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generative altruism is defined as the non-contradictory satisfaction of promoting the prosperity and/or success of other individuals (Seelig and Rosof, 2001, p. 947). Such altruism (generative altruism) functions as an attitude and commitment to care for and help others without expecting any reward or direct benefit, in which case the main motivating element of altruism is the concept of compassion (Büssing et al, 2013). Compassion is a concept that involves emotional empathy for the afflicted or suffering individuals, the emotional response that triggers the urge to act, and then helps to alleviate the trouble and pain (Büssing et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tablo 2 Döndürme Sonrası Maddi Değerler öLçeğine (Mdö) Ait mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A scale that measures generative altruism is not included in our literature. Therefore, it was decided to adapt the generative altruism scale developed by Büssing, Kerksieck, Günther, and Baumann (2013). Considering that this scale can be used in pre-adolescents, adolescents, young adults, adults and religious adult samples and consists of nine items, it is predicted that such a useful and comprehensive scale will contribute to the literature and experts.…”
Section: Tablo 2 Döndürme Sonrası Maddi Değerler öLçeğine (Mdö) Ait mentioning
confidence: 99%