2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcata.2010.03.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alumina-supported iron oxide nanoparticles as Fischer–Tropsch catalysts: Effect of particle size of iron oxide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
97
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 200 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
16
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result could be explained in terms of that the reduction process Fe 3 O 4  FeO  Fe took place continuously, as it has been reported elsewhere [27].…”
Section: Oxygen Carrier Reducibilitysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…This result could be explained in terms of that the reduction process Fe 3 O 4  FeO  Fe took place continuously, as it has been reported elsewhere [27].…”
Section: Oxygen Carrier Reducibilitysupporting
confidence: 78%
“…TPR results in Figure 4 show that the iron catalyst produces a broad peak at 450°C, with a further series of peaks at temperatures between 700 and 850°C. The reduction of iron oxide supported on alumina is complex and occurs in a number of stages [54][55][56]. Park et al report that a first peak between 400 and 560 °C is related to the conversion of Fe 2 O 3 into Fe 3 O 4 , which subsequently is reduced into FeO and Fe metal at 600-800°C [56].…”
Section: Iron Aluminamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of iron oxide supported on alumina is complex and occurs in a number of stages [54][55][56]. Park et al report that a first peak between 400 and 560 °C is related to the conversion of Fe 2 O 3 into Fe 3 O 4 , which subsequently is reduced into FeO and Fe metal at 600-800°C [56]. As such, the first peak observed in TPR represents the first stage of reduction into Fe 3 O 4 , whilst further peaks represent the subsequent reduction to and Fe.…”
Section: Iron Aluminamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have reasonably strong interaction with the surfaces of meso-MgO support thus suppressing the reduction of the particles that are limited to mesoporous material. In contrast, the big particles have less contact area with the support, consequently resulting in more reduction of NiO to Ni [26,27]. The calculated reduction degrees of Ni species are listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Tpr Test Of Catalyst Precursorsmentioning
confidence: 99%