2017
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000004670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Alzheimer disease brain atrophy subtypes are associated with cognition and rate of decline

Abstract: AD subtypes with phenotypes consistent with those observed with tau neuropathology can be identified in vivo with vMRI. An increased HV:CTV ratio was predictive of faster clinical decline in participants with AD who were clinically indistinguishable at baseline except for a greater dysexecutive presentation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

20
185
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 142 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
20
185
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are also several limitations. First, compared with other studies, we had an overrepresentation of limbic‐predominant and especially hippocampal‐sparing cases relative to typical patients with AD, possibly due to cohort effects, methodological aspects, or the relatively young mean age of the sample. However, group characteristics were largely in line with previous studies (e.g., younger age and APOE ɛ4 prevalence in hippocampal‐sparing AD), suggesting that comparable subtypes were captured across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are also several limitations. First, compared with other studies, we had an overrepresentation of limbic‐predominant and especially hippocampal‐sparing cases relative to typical patients with AD, possibly due to cohort effects, methodological aspects, or the relatively young mean age of the sample. However, group characteristics were largely in line with previous studies (e.g., younger age and APOE ɛ4 prevalence in hippocampal‐sparing AD), suggesting that comparable subtypes were captured across studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Various structural neuroimaging approaches have been used to identify subtypes of Alzheimer's disease (AD) based on patterns of regional atrophy . These studies identified reproducible AD subtypes, namely “limbic‐predominant”, “hippocampal‐sparing”, “typical” (i.e., a combination of limbic‐predominant and hippocampal‐sparing) AD, and, to a lesser extent, “mild atrophy” AD .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possible future direction is to investigate new features, e.g., those derived from diffusion MRI or arterial spin labeling. Previous studies have also suggested that different atrophy patterns (beyond the temporal lobe) might influence cognitive decline early in the disease process (Noh et al, 2014;Byun et al, 2015;Ferreira et al, 2017;Zhang et al, 2016;Risacher et al, 2017;Sun et al, 2019), so the atrophy features considered in this study (Table 1) might not be optimal. Although the new features may be correlated with currently used features, the new features might still provide complementary information when modeling AD progression (Popescu et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consequently, there is significant interest in predicting the longitudinal disease progression of individuals. A major difficulty is that although AD commonly presents as an amnestic syndrome, there is significant heterogeneity across individuals (Murray et al, 2011;Noh et al, 2014;Zhang et al, 2016;Risacher et al, 2017;Young et al, 2018;Sun et al, 2019). Since AD dementia is marked by beta-amyloid-and tau-mediated injuries, followed by brain atrophy and cognitive decline (Jack et al, , 2013, a multimodal approach might be more effective than a single modality approach to disentangle this heterogeneity and predict longitudinal disease progression .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,14,37 In fact, cognition has been identified as a primary predictor as well as a moderator variable when examining different types of functioning. 9,38 Compromised attention, frontal dysfunction (ie, initiation, perseveration, and conceptualization), poor construction abilities, and impaired memory, all cognitive abilities measured in this study, would explain worsening abilities to accomplish many instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). New important scientific work in brain network connectivity for persons with dementia, 39 and specifically among persons with DLB, 40 may hold structural and functional explanations for the association between worsening cognition and function.…”
Section: Compromised Cognitionmentioning
confidence: 92%