1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02477518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AM1 calculations of bond dissociation energies. Allylic and benzylic C-H bonds

Abstract: AM1 method and correlation dependence between electronic relaxation energy and valence change on the C atom of the breaking bond were used to calculate the bond dissociation energies in 50 compounds with allylic or benzylic C-H bonds. The average calculation error is 0.8 keal/mol.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
25
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The bond dissociation energy, which is a good indicator of the radical energy (31), is estimated to be approximately 86.2 kcal/ mol for a benzyl radical with a p-methyl group (35), although the value would be affected slightly depending on the relative location of the alkyloxy group on the aromatic group of GEM-1-O-gluc (m-alkyloxy group relative to the benzyl radical would decrease the energy, but the effects of a o-alkyloxy group are less predictable). This estimated value is near the lower limit (88 ( 1 kcal/mol) that Worjciechowski and Ortiz de Montellano have identified as the minimal energy needed to react with a meso-carbon on compound II of horseradish peroxidase (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bond dissociation energy, which is a good indicator of the radical energy (31), is estimated to be approximately 86.2 kcal/ mol for a benzyl radical with a p-methyl group (35), although the value would be affected slightly depending on the relative location of the alkyloxy group on the aromatic group of GEM-1-O-gluc (m-alkyloxy group relative to the benzyl radical would decrease the energy, but the effects of a o-alkyloxy group are less predictable). This estimated value is near the lower limit (88 ( 1 kcal/mol) that Worjciechowski and Ortiz de Montellano have identified as the minimal energy needed to react with a meso-carbon on compound II of horseradish peroxidase (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…disclosed two additional examples of photoredox sulfur multicatalysis, in which both simple alkenes and alcohols were used as substrates for radical cross‐coupling with electron‐deficient (hetero)arenes 2 and 16 , respectively (Scheme ) . In the first of these investigations, the low BDE of allylic C(sp 3 )−H bonds (81–83 kcal mol −1 ) was harnessed for the allylic arylation of mono‐, di‐, and trisubstituted olefins 13 and compounds with similarly labile C−H bonds (Scheme A) . The conversion of these substrates was facilitated by 1 mol % of iridium catalyst 6 and 5 mol % of triisopropylsilanethiol (S‐cat.…”
Section: Functionalization Of Element–hydrogen Bondsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 (Schema 4) fungieren kçnnen. [27] In der ersten der beiden Studien nutzten die Autoren die niedrige BDE allylischer C(sp 3 ) À H-Bindungen (81-83 kcal mol À1 ) [28] fürdie allylische Arylierung von mono-, di-und trisubstituierten Olefinen 13 und Verbindungen mit ähnlich labilen CÀH-Bindungen (Schema 4a). [27a] Der Umsatz der Reaktionspartner konnte mithilfe von einem Mol-% des Iridium-Katalysators 6 und 5Mol-% an Tr iisopropylsilanthiol (S-Kat.…”
Section: Funktionalisierungen Von Element-wasserstoff-bindungenunclassified