2003
DOI: 10.1109/mic.2003.1167344
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item collaborative filtering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
2,451
0
65

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,719 publications
(2,520 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
2,451
0
65
Order By: Relevance
“…We have chosen this algorithm because it is widely used to recommend items when the modeling of user preferences is not a valid option (as in most of real scenarios [17][18][19] and others [20][21][22][23]). This algorithm requires users to rate an initial set of items.…”
Section: Group Recommendation Systems Grsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen this algorithm because it is widely used to recommend items when the modeling of user preferences is not a valid option (as in most of real scenarios [17][18][19] and others [20][21][22][23]). This algorithm requires users to rate an initial set of items.…”
Section: Group Recommendation Systems Grsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CBF approaches and CF algorithms have both been used fairly successfully to build recommendation systems in various domains [11][12][13]16]. However, as described above, they suffer from the cold-start problem in one form or another.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method, while exploring previous check-ins across users, does not assess similarity between users in predicting future locations, an aspect that our research suggests is beneficial. Traditional work in collaborative filtering (e.g., Amazon recommendations) has also focused on measuring user similarity, but typically concentrates on "structured" data such as numerical (star) ratings [11,3].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%