2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.csr.2018.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amazon water lenses and the influence of the North Brazil Current on the continental shelf

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our two extreme cases (tidal vs. nontidal ocean) can be put in parallel with the two opposed cases observed in the AMASSEDS cruises, during spring and neap tides (Beardsley et al, 1995;Geyer, 1995;Geyer & Kineke, 1995; as well as in the AMANDES moorings (Prestes et al, 2018), and simulated in the idealized model of Fontes et al (2008): According to these studies, during spring tides the production of vertical turbulence is strong enough to push offshore the location of the northwestward deflection of the plume waters, whereas during neap tides the system behaves virtually like in our NoTide experiment, with a plume being deflected northwestward right upon entering the ocean and subsequently remaining much closer to the shore. We verified this by compositing the currents and SSS of our Model experiment, during the spring tides as well as during the neap tides, over 1 year (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Our two extreme cases (tidal vs. nontidal ocean) can be put in parallel with the two opposed cases observed in the AMASSEDS cruises, during spring and neap tides (Beardsley et al, 1995;Geyer, 1995;Geyer & Kineke, 1995; as well as in the AMANDES moorings (Prestes et al, 2018), and simulated in the idealized model of Fontes et al (2008): According to these studies, during spring tides the production of vertical turbulence is strong enough to push offshore the location of the northwestward deflection of the plume waters, whereas during neap tides the system behaves virtually like in our NoTide experiment, with a plume being deflected northwestward right upon entering the ocean and subsequently remaining much closer to the shore. We verified this by compositing the currents and SSS of our Model experiment, during the spring tides as well as during the neap tides, over 1 year (2015).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…During the AMANDES project, a mooring was deployed at the continental shelf, which recorded the transport rate of the northwestward current at 10 m depth (location 1.1°N, 46.7°W at the 50 m isobaths). Highly temporal variable transport rates were observed with a maximum value up to 100 cm s −1 and a minimum value when currents are flowing toward southeast (Prestes et al 2018). Drifters launched at the Amazon mouth during AmasSeds program revealed transport rates in the range of 41–128 cm s −1 (Limeburner et al 1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While 224 Ra, 226 Ra, and 228 Ra activities have been reported in this region in a previous study (Moore et al 1995), the AZ4R cruise provided the earliest samples measured for 224 Ra and 223 Ra data offshore the Amazon mouth. The second set of samples originated from the AMANDES project (2007–2008); (Le Bars et al 2010; Rousseau et al 2015; Prestes et al 2018). These latter campaigns aimed at better understanding the physico‐chemical exchange processes that take place in the Amazon delta and along the Brazilian continental shelf and at evaluating the impact on the chemical composition of the Atlantic Ocean waters.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another relevant aspect to be considered is that the mean values used to calculate the mixing models and the sediment accumulation have quite some variation, even within one zone (Table 1). In addition, the flux in the Amazon river and the direction of the river plume changes radically over the hydrological seasons, due to the periodic floods and the marine currents (Coles et al, 2015;Molleri, et al, 2010;Prestesa et al, 2018). Thus, our results did not include all the events and processes that could affect the quantification of carbon burial in the continental shelf and marine sites.…”
Section: Accumulation Of Continental and Marine Organic Carbon Transe...mentioning
confidence: 99%