2007
DOI: 10.1002/smll.200700414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient AFM Nanoscale Oxidation of Hydrogen‐Passivated Silicon with Conductive‐Diamond‐Coated Probes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figs. There are two plausible explanations: the CDT surface has a hydrophobic nature 30 and hydrogen evolution ͑2H+2e → H 2 ͒ as a cathode reaction on the boron-doped diamond surface is slow. Similarly, it has been reported that fine oxide patterns were fabricated in ambient air with a carbon nanotube tip, which is expected to be relatively hydrophobic as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figs. There are two plausible explanations: the CDT surface has a hydrophobic nature 30 and hydrogen evolution ͑2H+2e → H 2 ͒ as a cathode reaction on the boron-doped diamond surface is slow. Similarly, it has been reported that fine oxide patterns were fabricated in ambient air with a carbon nanotube tip, which is expected to be relatively hydrophobic as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 26-28 , 30 , 31 ] Furthermore, the nanopattern lateral size is observed to increase with increasing relative humidity (see Figure S2, Supporting Information), which has been widely observed in previous studies of AFM local anodic oxidation and most commonly attributed to the increasing size of the water meniscus at the tip-sample junction at elevated humidity. [11][12][13] The kinetics and chemistry (indicated by HF etching) of the cAFM nanopatterns on EG/SiC also share qualitative similarities to local anodic oxidation on other substrates such as silicon. [11][12][13] While local anodic oxidation is the likely overarching mechanism, a closer inspection reveals many unique features of cAFM nanopatterning on EG/SiC.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201100367mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[11][12][13] The kinetics and chemistry (indicated by HF etching) of the cAFM nanopatterns on EG/SiC also share qualitative similarities to local anodic oxidation on other substrates such as silicon. [11][12][13] While local anodic oxidation is the likely overarching mechanism, a closer inspection reveals many unique features of cAFM nanopatterning on EG/SiC. For example, in Figure 1 b , the dots nanopatterned at biases above 7 V show anisotropic structure laterally even though the surface was fully graphitized in this case.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/adma201100367mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The application of a negative bias to the cAFM tip will then drive anodic oxidation of the sample . This technique, called field-induced oxidation (FIO), has been employed on Si and metals to create nanopatterned regions of surface oxide. …”
Section: Epitaxial Graphene On Silicon Carbidementioning
confidence: 99%