2019
DOI: 10.1080/09524622.2019.1605310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient noise decreases detectability of songbird vocalizations in passive acoustic recordings in a consistent pattern across species, frequency, and analysis method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies are necessary to ascertain whether the urban observation of species previously considered absent or rare in this kind of environment during the lockdowns was due to a higher abundance of individuals, to a temporal change in the availability of ecological niches as a result of the reduction in anthropogenic disturbance ( Derryberry et al, 2020 ; Rutz et al, 2020 ), to an increased detectability of birds following a decrease in environmental noise levels ( Apol et al, 2020 ), or to a reflection of a larger number of observers present. Nonetheless, we note that similar processes were observed as a result of a reduction in human disturbance on other occasions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies are necessary to ascertain whether the urban observation of species previously considered absent or rare in this kind of environment during the lockdowns was due to a higher abundance of individuals, to a temporal change in the availability of ecological niches as a result of the reduction in anthropogenic disturbance ( Derryberry et al, 2020 ; Rutz et al, 2020 ), to an increased detectability of birds following a decrease in environmental noise levels ( Apol et al, 2020 ), or to a reflection of a larger number of observers present. Nonetheless, we note that similar processes were observed as a result of a reduction in human disturbance on other occasions (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, more importantly, detectability increases with SNR: even though extremely low SNR microphone elements are almost non-existent, it is worthwhile to search for the highest SNR in the market of existing microphone elements. Moreover, the detection areas of our wide range of microphone elements did not reach a clear saturation point, although detection spaces are eventually limited by the ambient sound ( Apol, Valentine & Proppe, 2019 ; Darras et al, 2018a ). Crucially, the best-performance microphones can be obtained at little additional expense: as an example, the lowest signal-to-noise PUI Audio microphone element (55 dB SPL) cost us 3.10 EUR (at the time of purchase, via Digikey.com), only a little less (28%) than the highest signal-to-noise PUI Audio microphone element (80 dB SPL) that cost 4.25 EUR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Some experimental evidence indicates that species whose songs encompass many frequencies (i.e., are more complex) may have a greater chance of detection during point counts than species whose calls vary less, especially in the presence of noise interference (Koper et al 2016). Amplitude (volume) of ambient noise has a stronger masking effect on bird songs than ambient noise frequency (Apol et al 2019). Thus, the combination of the high complexity and relative loudness of Winter Wren songs makes it unlikely that all song frequencies would be effectively masked by ambient noise.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%