1989
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290180210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambient vibration survey of the bosporus suspension bridge

Abstract: Summary.Traffic and wind excitation has been used to obtain the dynamic characteristics of the fust Bosporus suspension bddge. Structural symmetry and the absence of suspended side-spans allowed attettion to be focused on the main span and the Asian tower. For the main spa4 18 vertical and 20 lateral modes were obtained, including to$ional modes. For the tower, 12 vertical plane and lateral plane modes were abstracted, again ircluding torsion. All these modes lie in the range G1.1 Hz.A detailed comparison is g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
1
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
31
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The fundamental frequency of the Bridge in the vertical and lateral directions, calculated using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) analysis using Matlab were 0.116Hz and 0.052Hz respectively. These compared well to previous measurements [Brownjohn et al, 1986;Brownjohn et al, 1994] and FEM calculated frequencies [Karuna et al, 1997a;Karuna et al, 1997b;Karuna et al, 1998a;Karuna et al, 1998b;Brown et al, 1999]. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate two of the 5 height plots for the GNSS receivers located on the Bridge.…”
Section: Field Test Number 2; Validation Of Finite Element Numerical supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The fundamental frequency of the Bridge in the vertical and lateral directions, calculated using Fast Fourier Transformation (FFT) analysis using Matlab were 0.116Hz and 0.052Hz respectively. These compared well to previous measurements [Brownjohn et al, 1986;Brownjohn et al, 1994] and FEM calculated frequencies [Karuna et al, 1997a;Karuna et al, 1997b;Karuna et al, 1998a;Karuna et al, 1998b;Brown et al, 1999]. Figures 5 and 6 illustrate two of the 5 height plots for the GNSS receivers located on the Bridge.…”
Section: Field Test Number 2; Validation Of Finite Element Numerical supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Through the last few decades the technology has been applied e.g. on the Golden Gate Bridge, for the second time, using a specially designed mechanical accelerometer (Vincent, 1962) and the third (but not the last) time, by Nigbor (Nigbor, 1984), who provides the experimental detail behind the results presented later in (Abdel-Ghaffar and Scanlan, 1985), on the Humber Bridge (Brownjohn et al, 1987) at Deer Isle (Kumarasena et al, 1989) , both Bosporus bridges (Brownjohn et al, 1989;Brownjohn et al, 1992), Tsing Ma Bridge (Xu et al, 1997) and Storebaelt Bridge, (Frandsen, 2001), to name a few examples. More recent exercises e.g.…”
Section: Dynamic Testing For Condition Assessment and System Identifimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although ambient vibration tests (AVTs) provide valuable information for structural identification, verification of analytical models [2][3][4][5][6], and understanding the aerodynamic effect on long-span bridges [7,8], the small excitations they produce are not always adequate. Observations show that the dynamic performances of the structures are quite different during relatively small excitations of ambient vibration and during stronger excitations such as ground motion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%