Ambiguities in the Early Stages of Public Sector Enterprise Architecture Implementation: Outlining Complexities of Interoperability

Larsson, Hannu

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_31

Cited by 5 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent research such as (Dutta et al 2017;Sedek et al 2013;Cellary and Strykowski 2009) found that SOA-based architecture is more suitable for Digital Government and according to our findings, most architecture (57%) adopts SOA. Other literature (Agarwal et al 2017;Janssen and Kuk 2006;Zheng and Zheng 2011;Larsson 2011) revealed that Enterprise Architecture has become increasingly popular. Considering the technological aspects of the reviewed architectures, we found that the majority of the architecture employs XML-based technologies, i.e., WSDL, RDF SPARQL, and Web Services, i.e., SOAP and REST, which shows that XML-based technologies and Web Services are the most natural choice candidate technologies and standards to support and base Digital Government systems Meneklis et al (2005).…”

Section: Existing Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, government structure is much broader than a single organization, and it is comprised of separate agencies (ministries, governorates, and municipalities) (Janssen et al 2013;Klischewski and Abubakr 2010). Considering the structure of government, various other challenges of EA are widely known in Digital Government, such as implementation ability and governance (Isomäki and Liimatainen 2008;Klischewski and Abubakr 2010), legislative and socially rooted boundaries (Klischewski and Abubakr 2010;Larsson 2011;Isomäki and Liimatainen 2008), and lack of shared infrastructure (Klischewski and Abubakr 2010;Isomäki and Liimatainen 2008). Furthermore, Larsson Larsson (2011) argues that EA in the public sector, to a large extent, is immature.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Considering the structure of government, various other challenges of EA are widely known in Digital Government, such as implementation ability and governance (Isomäki and Liimatainen 2008;Klischewski and Abubakr 2010), legislative and socially rooted boundaries (Klischewski and Abubakr 2010;Larsson 2011;Isomäki and Liimatainen 2008), and lack of shared infrastructure (Klischewski and Abubakr 2010;Isomäki and Liimatainen 2008). Furthermore, Larsson Larsson (2011) argues that EA in the public sector, to a large extent, is immature. There is also a lack of empirical studies focusing on how to utilize EA, particularly in public sector reforms, successfully Isomäki and Liimatainen (2008).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects

Baheer

Lamas

Sousa

2020

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

System architecture plays a crucial role in the establishment of Digital Government infrastructure. Over recent decades, various architectures have been introduced by scholars for the establishment of Digital Government infrastructure. However, there is no uniform agreement on Digital Government architecture concepts required for Digital Government infrastructure. To more thoroughly examine the Digital Government architecture introduced in this article, we collected 103 papers published between 2003 and 2020 retrieved from five leading literature databases. To conduct our research, we followed best practice scholarly accepted guidelines for researchers. Per the guidelines, we formulated research questions and employed an approach based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria to meet our research goals. Our study found evidence that there is a lack of knowledge in terms of the state-of-the-art in Digital Government infrastructure and its challenges concerning existing Digital Government architectures. We identified a set of primary Digital Government architecture characteristics and building blocks on which the Digital Government infrastructures are built. These components are meant to improve the design of future Digital Government systems and applications. Furthermore, our research revealed a need for designing a reference architecture to provide government organizations with the best practice knowledge of already existing Digital Government architectures.

show abstract

Section: Existing Architecturesmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects

Baheer

Lamas

Sousa

2020

Administrative Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Para el sector público y los gobiernos locales, la AE puede brindar la vista integral de gestión requerida por éstos, ya que soporta una visión sociotécnica de las organizaciones gubernamentales locales, incluidas las personas, la información, y la tecnología (Saha, 2009;Larsson, 2011). Desde una visión holística de la organización, la AE está representada desde cuatro perspectivas (Saha, 2007; Jin & Kung, 2010): arquitectura de negocios, arquitectura de aplicaciones, arquitectura de tecnología y arquitectura de datos.…”

Section: Arquitectura Empresarialunclassified

Identificación de principios de arquitectura empresarial para la gestión de factores de impacto en entidades públicas colombianas utilizando TOGAF

Bueno

Pineda

2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recibido: 2 de marzo de 2015 Aprobado: 25 de mayo de 2015 ResumenCon el lanzamiento del marco de arquitectura nacional en Colombia, la Arquitectura Empresarial (AE) está tomando cada vez más auge en el sector público, con el propósito de mejorar y transformar la organización desde las Tecnologías de la Información (TI) y el área de negocios. Se han identificado factores de impacto para la implementación de AE que fueron recopilados mediante una revisión bibliométrica de investigaciones internacionales en un trabajo anterior y aunque los principios de arquitectura empresarial (PAE) son considerados como un elemento fundamental en la definición de AE, se encuentran algunas limitaciones en la definición de los mismos, dado que no abarcan y brindan importancia suficiente a dichos factores. Este trabajo propone un conjunto de principios de arquitectura bajo el "framework" de Togaf, basados en la gestión e importancia de los factores de impacto para la implementación de AE en el sector público colombiano, con el fin de convertir a futuro dichos factores en principios y otorgar la importancia requerida a estos, a lo largo de una AE en una entidad pública.Palabras claves: Arquitectura empresarial, Sector público, Administración pública, Principios arquitectura empresarial. AbstractWith the release of national architecture framework in Colombia, Enterprise Architecture (EA) is taking more and more popularity in the public sector, in order to improve and transform the organization from the Information Technology (IT) area Business. There are impact factors identified for the implementation of EA, that were collected through a bibliographical revision of international investigations on previous work and although the principles of enterprise architecture (AEP) are considered as a fundamental element in the definition of EA, there are some limitations on the definition thereof, since these do not cover and give sufficient importance to these factors. This paper proposes a set of principles of architecture under the "framework" of TOGAF, based on the management and importance of impact factors for the implementation of AE in the Colombian public sector, in order to convert these factors in early and give the importance required to, along a public entity EA.

show abstract

“…Enterprise Architecture (EA) has been seen as a promising tool for improving information systems interoperability, standardization and business-IT alignment in the rapidly changing world of public administration [5], [23]. However, experiences in using EA in the public sector are mixed [10], [13], [18].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Construction of Enterprise Architecture in Discourses Within the Public Sector

Lemmetti

2016

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Part 4: Smart InnovationsInternational audienceEnterprise Architecture (EA) has been employed in the public sector to improve efficiency and interoperability of information systems. Despite their daily use in the public sector, the concepts of Enterprise Architecture and efficiency are ambiguous and lack commonly accepted definitions. The benefits and outcomes of using EA in the public sector have been studied with mixed results. This study examined the use of EA in the Finnish basic education system using critical discourse analysis (CDA). The research revealed how the role and rationale of EA is constructed in the speech of public sector officials. Three orders of discourse, each having its own views on EA, were found. While there were commonly accepted functions for EA, there were also areas where the concepts were not mutually understood or accepted

show abstract

Ambiguities in the Early Stages of Public Sector Enterprise Architecture Implementation: Outlining Complexities of Interoperability

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects

A Systematic Literature Review on Existing Digital Government Architectures: State-of-the-Art, Challenges, and Prospects

Identificación de principios de arquitectura empresarial para la gestión de factores de impacto en entidades públicas colombianas utilizando TOGAF

Construction of Enterprise Architecture in Discourses Within the Public Sector

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About