2012
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2144673
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguity in the Cross-Section of Expected Returns: An Empirical Assessment

Abstract: This internet appendix provides information on summary statistics, the estimation technique, as well as on the simulation study that are not contained in the paper.Section 1 comprises a table with summary statistics of the data used in the paper.Section 2 describes how we estimate the model parameters and conduct tests with GMM. In Section 3, we briefly review the long-run risks model and its solution.We then discuss the conditional expected value, a key feature of the smooth ambiguity model. Afterwards, we ex… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thimme and Völkert () construct a proxy that contains human capital from the variable cay as introduced by Lettau and Ludvigson () and show that it is much less volatile than the return on a stock market index. The authors assume that human capital is proportional to labor income, an assumption which is rather established in the literature (see, e.g., Jagannathan and Wang ()), although criticized by Lustig et al .…”
Section: Consumers' Preferences and The Eismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thimme and Völkert () construct a proxy that contains human capital from the variable cay as introduced by Lettau and Ludvigson () and show that it is much less volatile than the return on a stock market index. The authors assume that human capital is proportional to labor income, an assumption which is rather established in the literature (see, e.g., Jagannathan and Wang ()), although criticized by Lustig et al .…”
Section: Consumers' Preferences and The Eismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead of considering the return on wealth Rw,t+1 in the Euler equation, another idea is to use aggregate wealth Wt directly, or the consumption‐to‐wealth ratio Ct/Wt which is assumed to be stationary. While Thimme and Völkert () use a proxy of the ratio to come up with a return proxy, Campbell () suggests a more direct approach. Following Campbell and Shiller (), the consumer's budget constraint Wt+1=Rw,t+1false(WtCtfalse) can be solved for Rw,t+1 and log‐linearized, which gives the approximate identity truerightrw,t+1=κ0κ1(ct+1wt+1)+(ctwt)+normalΔct+1with log consumption‐to‐wealth ratio cw and constants κ 0 and κ 1 , where κ 1 is the steady state of false(WtCtfalse)/Wt.…”
Section: Consumers' Preferences and The Eismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Empirical studies on reduced-form estimation of models with ambiguity aversion include Anderson, Ghysels, and Juergens (2009), Viale, Garcia-Feijoo, and Giannetti (2014), and Thimme and Völkert (2015). These papers show that ambiguity aversion is priced in the cross-section of expected returns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fixing the IES at the calibrated value, Thimme and Völkert (2015) use the generalized method of moments (GMM) to estimate the ambiguity aversion parameter. Both Viale, Garcia-Feijoo, and Giannetti (2014) and Thimme and Völkert (2015) formulate the stochastic discount factor (SDF) under ambiguity using reduced-form regression methods. Ahn, Choi, Gale, and Kariv (2014) use experimental data to estimate ambiguity aversion in static portfolio choice settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%