2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00199-017-1056-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguity sharing and the lack of relative performance evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Suppose, following [1,9,24], that in addition to project performance, compensation contracts can be written on another variable that is correlated with the noise component of project performance. This variable is assumed to be uninformative about the EN's action.…”
Section: General Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Suppose, following [1,9,24], that in addition to project performance, compensation contracts can be written on another variable that is correlated with the noise component of project performance. This variable is assumed to be uninformative about the EN's action.…”
Section: General Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miao and Rivera [8] studied two types of robust contract problems with output uncertainty; they dealt the principal's maximization problem under the worst-case scenario and found ambiguity aversion lowers outside securities value while increases the credit yield spread. Wu et al [9] extended the Holmstrom and Milgrom [1] model by incorporating model uncertainty to study robust long-term contracting and explore the connection between ambiguity sharing and relative performance evaluation. In addition, they provided a theoretical explanation of paying for luck through writing the compensation contracts on additional signals, such as industry average performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations