2011
DOI: 10.1080/1600910x.2011.621048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambiguous citizenship: ‘Postmodern’ versus ‘modern’ welfare at the margins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A bit of analytical complexity could be added to this understanding by drawing briefly (and loosely) upon some basic ideas concerning paradoxes in Niklas Luhmann. This is not the place to debate the compatibilities and incompatibilities between Foucault and Luhmann's systems theory at the level of epistemology (see for instance, Borch, 2005), nor to contrast Luhmann's sympathetic attitude to the modern, rational bureaucracy with postmodern values of fluidity, fragmentation and respect for unique individuality (Villadsen, 2011a;DuGay, 2000). I merely wish to add to my analytical approach a few elementary points from Luhmann which seem immediately reconcilable with Foucault's approach to government and power (Pottage, 1998).…”
Section: Most Of the Time The State Is Envisioned As A Kind Of Politmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A bit of analytical complexity could be added to this understanding by drawing briefly (and loosely) upon some basic ideas concerning paradoxes in Niklas Luhmann. This is not the place to debate the compatibilities and incompatibilities between Foucault and Luhmann's systems theory at the level of epistemology (see for instance, Borch, 2005), nor to contrast Luhmann's sympathetic attitude to the modern, rational bureaucracy with postmodern values of fluidity, fragmentation and respect for unique individuality (Villadsen, 2011a;DuGay, 2000). I merely wish to add to my analytical approach a few elementary points from Luhmann which seem immediately reconcilable with Foucault's approach to government and power (Pottage, 1998).…”
Section: Most Of the Time The State Is Envisioned As A Kind Of Politmentioning
confidence: 99%