1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1996.tb09761.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ambulatory urodynamic monitoring

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(72 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following are possible explanations of the existence of the low Vol/Void USI subgroup: (1) the low Vol/ Void USI patients might have uninhibited detrusor contractions during everyday life that were not observed on urodynamic testing (e.g., detrusor contractions that might have been detected by ambulatory urodynamics). 5 (2) The subgroup might simply consist of patients with more severe stress incontinence who void more frequently as a coping mechanism. (The predominance of urge-related leaks and the higher incidence of complaints of urgency argue against his explanation.)…”
Section: Stress Incontinence Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following are possible explanations of the existence of the low Vol/Void USI subgroup: (1) the low Vol/ Void USI patients might have uninhibited detrusor contractions during everyday life that were not observed on urodynamic testing (e.g., detrusor contractions that might have been detected by ambulatory urodynamics). 5 (2) The subgroup might simply consist of patients with more severe stress incontinence who void more frequently as a coping mechanism. (The predominance of urge-related leaks and the higher incidence of complaints of urgency argue against his explanation.)…”
Section: Stress Incontinence Subgroupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quality of life studies have shown that it has a significant impact on the lifestyle of sufferers, with particular effects on their emotional wellbeing and interpersonal relationships 2,3 . Although the ability to diagnose detrusor instability may have recently improved by ambulatory urodynamic monitoring 4 , both its cause and natural history are incompletely understood. It is perhaps for this reason that many different treatments have been used with varying degrees of success, and that none has been conclusively proven to have a convincing long term benefit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretical modelling and experimental studies suggest that over‐stretching can impair detrusor contraction strength and hence reduce Q max [4,5]. Further information was provided by studies comparing ambulatory natural‐fill urodynamics with conventional PFS, which showed that the 40–50% reduction in V void after natural‐fill was associated with increases in both Q max and p det.Qmax compared to sequential conventional PFS [9,10]. A subsequent comparative study where nonphysiological filling during conventional PFS was restricted to ‘normal desire to void’ found that the increase in Q max recorded after ambulatory filling was less pronounced and voiding pressure was similar, suggesting a dependency on filled volume rather than fill rate [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%