2000
DOI: 10.1053/rvsc.2000.0390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ameliorative effects of sodium bentonite on phagocytosis and Newcastle disease antibody formation in broiler chickens during aflatoxicosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
28
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
28
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As well, Manegar et al (2010) confirmed that aflatoxin causes bursal regression and suppress primary immune response for ND and Gumboro disease as evident by fall in ELISA titers. Enhancement of the humoral immune response after addition of binders like Humate or HSCAS in this investigation is in line with Ibrahim et al (2000) who citied that supplementation of sodium bentonite binder was significantly effective in ameliorating the negative effect of aflatoxin on the percentage and mean of phagocytosis and HI-titer in chicks vaccinated against ND. It has been reported that Humate significantly improve antibody levels in broiler chickens, fed graded levels of AF (Swamy and Devegowda, 1998), multiple mycotoxins (Raju and Devegowda, 2002) and also it inhibited lipid peroxidation in liver of quails fed T-2 toxin (Dvorska and Surai, 2001).…”
Section: Immune Response To Nd and Ibdsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…As well, Manegar et al (2010) confirmed that aflatoxin causes bursal regression and suppress primary immune response for ND and Gumboro disease as evident by fall in ELISA titers. Enhancement of the humoral immune response after addition of binders like Humate or HSCAS in this investigation is in line with Ibrahim et al (2000) who citied that supplementation of sodium bentonite binder was significantly effective in ameliorating the negative effect of aflatoxin on the percentage and mean of phagocytosis and HI-titer in chicks vaccinated against ND. It has been reported that Humate significantly improve antibody levels in broiler chickens, fed graded levels of AF (Swamy and Devegowda, 1998), multiple mycotoxins (Raju and Devegowda, 2002) and also it inhibited lipid peroxidation in liver of quails fed T-2 toxin (Dvorska and Surai, 2001).…”
Section: Immune Response To Nd and Ibdsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The beneficial effect of Mycofix® has been reported to ameliorate the negative effect of AF on IBDV antibody titres and the effects are attributed to the presence of phytogenic substances, a hepatoprotective flavolignins (silymarin) in Mycofix, which prevents toxins from entering the liver cell membranes, and as it contains the terpenoid complexes, which reduce inflammations and protect the mucous membranes (Biomin®, 2000). Similarly, Ibrahim et al, (2000) reported that SB is also effective in ameliorating the suppressive effect of AF on the HI-titer in chicks vaccinated against Newcastle disease and the best result was obtained when SB was added at a rate of 0.4% of feed to the AF-containing diets. This effect was attributed to the role of SB as a sequestering agent against AF present in the diet through reducing its bioavailability in the gastrointestinal tract (Araba and Wyatt, 1991).…”
Section: Antibody Titrementioning
confidence: 87%
“…Besides the preventive management, several approaches have been employed including physical (feed mill techniques, blending, extraction, irradiation, and heating), chemical (acids, bases, alkali treatments and oxidizing agents) biological treatments (certain species of fungi and bacteria) and solvent extraction to detoxify AF in contaminated feeds and feedstuffs (Coker et al, 1986;Piva et al, 1995;Parlat et al, 1999). Since the beginning of 1990s, the adsorbent-based studies have also been reported to be effective in removing AF from contaminated feed and minimise the toxicity of AF in poultry (Ibrahim et al, 2000). Among several adsorbents commercially available in the market, Zeolites (Miazzo et al, 2000), bentonites (Rosa et al, 2001, Pasha et al, 2007, 2008 and clinoptilolite (CLI), (Oguz and Kurtoglu, 2000;Oguz et al, 2000 a, b), were preferred because of their high binding capacities for AF and their reducing effect on AF-absorption from the gastrointestinal tract.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a five-week study on chickens for fattening, Manafi et al (2009) could show a reduction of the adverse effects of AfB 1 (500 µg/kg; significant reduction of body weight, feed consumption and antibody titres against Newcastle disease (ND) and Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD); increases in the relative liver weight) by 1 % bentonite in the diet. The adverse effects of aflatoxin (254 µg Af = 200 µg AfB 1 /kg diet) on antibody production against IBD were reduced by 0.5 % bentonite in the diet of chickens (254 µg Af = 200 µg AfB 1 /kg diet; Ghahri et al, 2009), on antibody production against ND by up to 0.6 % bentonite in the diet (2500 µg AF = 81 % AfB 1 /kg diet; Ibrahim et al, 2000). Eraslan et al (2005) observed that aflatoxin decreased calcium and phosphate levels in blood of chickens, which was less marked when bentonite at 0.25 or 0.5 % was added to the diet.…”
Section: Poultrymentioning
confidence: 99%