America's response to the rise of China and Sino‐US relations

Zhao, Quansheng

doi:10.1080/02185370508434256

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 8 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…China will not display any tolerance when its national interest and sovereignty is confronted. (Zhao, 2005) The above four strategies are the ways of "soft diplomacy" of China. Traditionally in the Old Cold War, hard power had been used to intimidate the challengers and antagonists.…”

Section: China's "Soft Balancing" Strategy Of Usmentioning

confidence: 99%

China's Grand Strategic Response over Global Unipolarity

Gul

Alam

Asghar

2019

GSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The USA, the victor of the Cold War, became supper power in 1992 and started to exercise its hegemony in the world. China, a Cold War ally of the US, became a stronger economy and came forward to encounter the Primacy of the US in Asia. In the name of peaceful development and cooperation, China has become the supreme exporter of the world and the second economy of the world. The advancement PRC has made in the arena of technology, military, space technology, its engagements in different regions, its soft balancing strategy in the world displays that China wants to perform as a forthcoming hegemon of the world. This paper analyze both the soft and hard balancing tactics of China to counter the omnipotence of the US in different regions of the world. The strategies of China illustrates that it is searching for a multipolar world.

show abstract

Section: China's "Soft Balancing" Strategy Of Usmentioning

confidence: 99%

China's Grand Strategic Response over Global Unipolarity

Gul

Alam

Asghar

2019

GSSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Within the literature, relations are typically broken down into three distinct periods, namely, the Cold War period, the post‐Cold War period, and the post‐September 2001 period. Scholars typically describe the evolution and nature of the relationship from the period of normalization in 1979 to the present and, from that, hypothesize whether future relations are more likely to be confrontational, competitive, or cooperative (Scalapino, ; Glasner, ; Zhao ; Friedberg, ; Peng, ; Zagoria, ; Freeman & Chas, ; Irvine, ). Neglected in these studies, except for the work of Friedberg (), are discussions that theorize about the nature of the Sino‐American relationship along the cooperative‐confrontational continuum.…”

Section: The Complexity Of Sino‐american Relations: a Review Of The Amentioning

confidence: 99%

Framing Sino‐American military relations: The power and problem of perception in preventing geostrategic security cooperation between China and the United States

Rudolph

2018

Asia & Pacific Policy Stud

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sino-American relations are composed of a complex field of factors that have influenced both cooperation and confrontation between the Chinese and Americans. The factors that present the most obstacles are undoubtedly rooted in the Sino-American military relationship where there has been a great deal of potentially dangerous misunderstandings. Part one of this study provides an overview of the literature on Sino-American relations, Sino-American military relations, and perception within the context of those relations. Part two builds on the sparse literature that focuses on perception by further exploring how western media perceives military relations through the analysis of media articles published in the Washington Post and the New York Times between 2001 and 2017. How military relations are framed in the media is important for understanding the perceptual boundaries within which policymakers can act along the cooperative-confrontational continuum. The study concludes that the confrontational discursive approach dominating the framing of military relations is problematic for ---This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. 182Asia Pac Policy Stud. 2018;5:182-195. wileyonlinelibrary.com/journal/app5 determining the most effective means of maintaining regional stability, order, and peace in the Asia Pacific region as well as facilitating geostrategic security cooperation between the two countries.

show abstract

“…China's economic raising causes the international world increasingly give more attention, including the US. It can be seen from the fundamental changes in the US foreign policy by President Bush, especially in Asia in the case of Taiwan and the North Korean nuclear crisis (Zhao, 2005). It was then followed by the US foreign policy under President Obama, named pivot to Asia.…”

Section: Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis: the Presence Of Mo-tives And Rivalry Of The Us And Chinamentioning

confidence: 99%

Motives and Rivalry of Superpower Countries: The United States and China in Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis

Ismail

2018

JHI

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Artikel ini berargumen terdapat motif politik dan ekonomi dibalik respon isu krisis kemanusiaan Rohingya yang merupakan bentuk rivalitas soft power Amerika Serikat (AS) dan China. Beberapa tulisan terdahulu menelaah rivalitas kedua negara dengan fokus isu keamanan dan isu ekonomi semata, namun belum ada artikel yang membahas rivalitas soft power keduanya. Artikel ini menggunakan metode penelitian kualitatif studi kasus serta teknik pengumpulan data studi pustaka. Temuannya adalah pipa gas dan minyak di Rakhine, pelabuhan Kyaukpyu sebagai jalur lintas perdagangan, penyebaran pengaruh nilai demokrasi oleh AS, serta latar belakang permasalahan krisis muslim Uighur di Xinjiang merupakan beberapa kepentingan nasional yang sebenarnya ingin dicapai melalui rivalitas soft power dua negara.

show abstract

America's response to the rise of China and Sino‐US relations

Cited by 14 publications

References 8 publications

China's Grand Strategic Response over Global Unipolarity

China's Grand Strategic Response over Global Unipolarity

Framing Sino‐American military relations: The power and problem of perception in preventing geostrategic security cooperation between China and the United States

Motives and Rivalry of Superpower Countries: The United States and China in Rohingya Humanitarian Crisis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About