American Colleges in the Nineteenth Century: From Localism to Denominationalism

Abstract

THE GENERAL CONTOURS of nineteenth-century collegiate de velopment, as found in the histories of American higher education, probably need substantial reexamination and extensive reshaping. Traditionally, colleges associated with various denominations are characterized largely in terms of sect-like religious zeal and are assigned the early nineteenth century as their period of importance. The few monographic studies of late nineteenth-century colleges and the more numerous works on the emergence of universities are correspondingly cast in a framework of increasing secularism in higher education. It seems more likely, however, that the current historical conception of the denominational college more closely coincides with realities of institutional development after rather than before 1850. In terms of support, control, and functions, there is evidence of a strong and increasing denominationalism in a large majority of late nineteenthcentury colleges. For most of the institutions with founding dates prior to 1850 this degree of denominationalism is a departure from the primary role played by localism in founding and nurturing these educational enterprises during their earliest years. Although additional research will be necessary to confirm this contrast, there is good reason to anticipate that the traditional generalization concerning a basic trend from sectarianism toward secularism, when applied to American collegiate history during the nineteenth century, will have to be in verted.

An Analytical Study of Impact of International Merger and Acquisitions on the Financial Performance for Higher Education Institution in the United States

“…Puritans believed that people who lacked understanding of sound biblical principles and virtue had greater vulnerability to violating moral imperatives thus proliferating sin in the surrounding culture. Beyond this concern the Puritans valued education because they believed education would raise the level of the colonial culture, produce graduates with independent minds, and encourage free inquiry (Potts, 1971). Therefore, these Puritans found it necessary, on behalf of the greater public good, to establish Harvard College for the training of men for the pastorate (Potts, 1971).…”

“…They felt an educated populace provided leadership that served American interests and transmitted values that defended the new republic against tyranny and aggression which threatened liberty (Harris, 2013). Americans also believed that HEI education would raise the cultural level of society and that HEIs possessed a responsibility to train America's young people (Potts, 1971). Because of these perceptions, the HEI landscape in America experienced significant growth as HEIs sought to produce educated citizens in a new republic desiring to expand the American identity (Harris, 2013).…”

An Affair to Remember: America's Brief Fling with the University as a Public Good

“…Often ministers were also land speculators. It was always better to have multiple rationales and sources of support than just one (Boorstin, ; Brown, ; Potts, ). In either case, however, the benefits of founding a college accrued to individual landowners and particular religious denominations and not to the larger public.…”

Strategic Action Fields inUSHigher Education: The 1939Mercer University Heresy Trial

“…From the establishment of Harvard College in the early 17 th century, higher education and Christian religious bodies were closely linked in the US. The early 20 th century witnessed the dissolution of many of these ties as administrative autonomy, disciplinary expertise, and academic freedom replaced religious authority (Geiger, ; Marsden, ; Potts, ; Reuben, ). Individuals who worked on campuses became powerful “incumbents” within the industry of higher education, while ministers and church officials remained incumbents in the conservative Protestant movement.…”