American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot scale: A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study from Iran

Vosoughi, Amir Reza; Roustaei, Narges; Mahdaviazad, Hamideh

doi:10.1016/j.fas.2017.02.007

Cited by 32 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…No floor or ceiling effects were observed for the AOFAS‐AH in people with an acute ankle sprain or for people with any foot or ankle condition . A ceiling effect was observed for the AOFAS‐M in people with Lisfranc joint injury .…”

Section: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating mentioning

confidence: 77%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Measures of Foot Pain, Foot Function, and General Foot Health

Whittaker

Munteanu

Roddy

et al. 2020

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating mentioning

confidence: 77%

“…The AOFAS‐AH has been translated and culturally adapted into Dutch , German , Italian , Persian , Portuguese , and Turkish .…”

Section: American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Clinical Rating mentioning

confidence: 99%

Measures of Foot Pain, Foot Function, and General Foot Health

Whittaker

Munteanu

Roddy

et al. 2020

Arthritis Care & Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Exclusion criteria were bilateral operations on the same patient, multiple foot surgeries, charcot foot or other structural foot abnormalities (except hallux valgus), rheumatoid arthritis and a recent foot trauma. We collected demographic data, physical examination documentation, pre-operative and the latest postoperative (36.2 ± 12.31 (range 12 to 54) months) functional score evaluations (AOFAS) [17]. Plain radiographic studies were taken at the following postoperative time points: 6 weeks, 3-6-12 months, and at 24 months when applicable.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the IOFix implant improve union rates?

Segal

Ohana

Nyska

et al. 2020

BMC Musculoskelet Disord

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background First metatarso-phalangeal joint fusion is the current gold standard for severe hallux rigidus. Data regarding the union rate and the re-operation rate when IOFix (an Intra-osseous fixation device, Extremity medical, New Jersey, USA) is used for hallux rigidus fusion is limited but promising. The aim of this study was to review our outcomes with the IOFix implant. Methods We have conducted a retrospective chart review, following the approval of the hospital IRB committee. Exclusion criteria included bilateral operations on the same patient, multiple surgeries, charcot foot or other structural foot abnormalities (except hallux valgus), rheumatoid arthritis and a recent foot trauma. We collected demographic data, physical examination documentation, functional score evaluations (AOFAS), and Plain radiographic studies. Results Thirty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.36 ± 9.12 (range 36 to 77) years, 18 (60%) female patients and 12 (40%) male. Fourteen (53.33%) were left side pathologies. The average follow up period was 36.2 ± 12.31 (range 12 to 54) months. Union was obtained in 28 (93.33%) patients, of whom none had requested a hardware removal due to a prominent hardware during a minimum of 2 year follow up period. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 80.5 ± 10.87 (range 35 to 90). A more stringent inclusion criteria and fusion definitions would have led to an exclusion of two more patients and a dropout of two patients from the “fused” group, which would have led to a fusion rate of 85.71%. Conclusions This is the largest series of hallux rigidus patients that were operated with an IOFix device. The rates of fusion and hardware removal in MTPJ1 arthrodesis performed with an IOFix implant were found to be similar at most when compared to previously described rates that were obtained with other cheaper and more simple fixation devices. Level of evidence 4

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Does the Expensive IOFix implant Improve Union Rates?

Segal¹,

Ohana²,

Nyska³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND First metatarso-phalangeal joint fusion is the current gold standard for severe hallux rigidus. Data regarding the union rate and the re-operation rate when IOFix (an Intra-osseous fixation device, Extremity medical, New Jersey, USA) is used for hallux rigidus fusion is limited but promising. The aim of this study was to review our outcomes with the IOFix implant. METHODS We have conducted a retrospective chart review, following the approval of the hospital IRB committee. Exclusion criteria included bilateral operations on the same patient, multiple surgeries, charcot foot or other structural foot abnormalities (except hallux valgus), rheumatoid arthritis and a recent foot trauma. We collected demographic data, physical examination documentation, functional score evaluations (AOFAS), and X-ray radiographic studies. RESULTS Thirty patients were included in the study. The mean age was 60.36 ± 9.12 (range 36 to 77) years, 18 (60%) female patients and 12 (40%) male. Fourteen (53.33%) were left side pathologies. The average follow up period was 36.2 ± 12.31 (range 12 to 54) months. Union was obtained in 28 (93.33%) patients, of whom none had requested a hardware removal due to a prominent hardware during a minimum of 2 year follow up period. The mean postoperative AOFAS score was 80.5 ± 10.87 (range 35 to 90). A more stringent inclusion criteria and fusion definitions would have led to an exclusion of two more patients and a dropout of two patients from the “fused” group, which would have led to a fusion rate of 85.71%. CONCLUSIONS This is the largest series of hallux rigidus patients that were operated with an IOFix device. The rates of fusion and hardware removal in MTPJ1 arthrodesis performed with an IOFix implant were found to be similar at most when compared to previously described rates that were obtained with other cheaper and more simple fixation devices.

show abstract

American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society ankle–hindfoot scale: A cross-cultural adaptation and validation study from Iran

Abstract: Persian version of AOFAS-AHFS provides additional reliable and valid instrument which can be used to assess broad range of patients with foot and ankle disorders that speaking in Persian. However, it seems that the original version of AOFAS-AHFS needs some revisions.

Cited by 32 publications

References 27 publications

Measures of Foot Pain, Foot Function, and General Foot Health

Measures of Foot Pain, Foot Function, and General Foot Health

Does the IOFix implant improve union rates?

Does the Expensive IOFix implant Improve Union Rates?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About