2013
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/sts589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

AMI Galactic Plane Survey at 16 GHz - I. Observing, mapping and source extraction

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flagging and calibration of the data were performed with the AMI REDUCE software (32,33). The calibrated data were then imported into CASA (34) and the flux densities of V404 Cygni were extracted by vector averaging over all baselines at multiple frequencies within the passband.…”
Section: Radio Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flagging and calibration of the data were performed with the AMI REDUCE software (32,33). The calibrated data were then imported into CASA (34) and the flux densities of V404 Cygni were extracted by vector averaging over all baselines at multiple frequencies within the passband.…”
Section: Radio Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise the reported peak fluxes are obtained by performing forced Gaussian fits at the position of either the radio counterpart seen in another AMI epoch, or at the best known Swift position of the GRB. The flux errors are the errors output by PYSE, added in quadrature to the AMI 5% calibration error (Perrott et al 2013) and are also primary beam corrected. The significance of the peak fluxes reported by PYSE are also included in these Tables.…”
Section: The Ami Grb Cataloguementioning
confidence: 99%
“…drive-ami utilises the REDUCE software package, which is designed to take the raw AMI-LA data and automatically flag for interference, shadowing, and hardware errors, conduct phase and amplitude calibrations, and Fourier transforms the data into uv -FITS format (Perrott et al 2013). Short, interleaved observations of J1856+0610 were used for phase calibration.…”
Section: Ami-lamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Imaging was conducted using the chimenea data reduction pipeline that has been specifically designed to deal with multi-epoch radio observations of transients (Staley & Anderson 2015). The resulting peak AMI-LA flux densities of XTE J1908+094 (Table 1) were measured using MIRIAD (Sault et al 1995) and systematic errors of 5% (Perrott et al 2013) should be added in quadrature. Note that the flux errors may be underestimated due to uncleanable artefacts resulting from the nearby off-axis radio-bright source that may be associated with the star forming region W49A (Webster et al 1971).…”
Section: Ami-lamentioning
confidence: 99%