1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(97)00899-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amino acid substitutions in the first transmembrane domain (TM1) of P‐glycoprotein that alter substrate specificity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5). These results are consistent with a previous study that examined the effects of arginine substitutions to residues Ala-57 to Leu-65 in TM1 on drug transport by P-gp (43). It was found that the H61R, G64R, and L65R mutations altered the substrate specificity of P-gp in drug resistance assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…5). These results are consistent with a previous study that examined the effects of arginine substitutions to residues Ala-57 to Leu-65 in TM1 on drug transport by P-gp (43). It was found that the H61R, G64R, and L65R mutations altered the substrate specificity of P-gp in drug resistance assays.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For example, the L65R mutation only caused a large reduction (57-fold) in the apparent affinity for vinblastine and little change in affinities for cyclosporin A or rhodamine B. The reduction in affinity of mutant L65R(TM1) for vinblastine is consistent with the observation that it had reduced ability to confer resistance to vinblastine (39). The F343R mutation exhibited decreased apparent affinity for rhodamine B (3.6-fold) and cyclosporin A (18-fold) but not for vinblastine (Ͻ2-fold).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Recent crystal structures of these two transporters showed that the amino acids involved in ligand binding are in agreement with those identified through mutational analyses (23,24). The residues in P-gp that are involved in drug binding, however, have been difficult to characterize because a large number of mutations throughout the molecule can alter the substrate specificity (25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31). It has been difficult to determine whether mutations that affected activity were actually close to the drug-binding site or whether they affected the global structure of the protein (32).…”
mentioning
confidence: 67%