Abstract:The
ability of the phosphino-naphthyl moiety to stabilize amino-
and alkylborenium cations has been studied. Surprisingly, the phosphine–aminochloroborane
precursor 2 was found to exist in neutral open form (without
P→B interaction) in benzene solution and in the solid state
but to ionize spontaneously in chloroform to generate the P-stabilized
borenium salt 3. Addition of gallium trichloride shifts
the process forward and affords the corresponding tetrachlorogallate
borenium salt 3′. The phosphine group of 2 … Show more
“…[31] Interestingly, the topological bond analysis revealed no principal difference between attractive and enforced B-P bonds in (ace-)naphthylphosphinoboranes. The new acenaphthylphosphinoboranes 13-16, bearing functionality at the B atom, might be of interest as starting materials for the synthesis of compound classes, such as P 2 B 2 heterocycles, [12,16] borenium ions, [18,20,21] and boron-centered radicals. [19] Experimental Section General: Reagents were obtained commercially (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and were used as received.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance between the forces is usually achieved by the judicious choice of the substituents, which contribute both via their electronic nature, as well as their steric bulk. In recent years, a number of aminoboranes and phosphinoboranes have been assembled in the peri positions of (ace‐)naphthyl scaffolds, which hold the Lewis acid and the Lewis base in close proximity. Besides their relevance for frustrated Lewis pair chemistry, some of the functionalized (ace‐)naphthylphosphinoboranes have been the starting point for the synthesis of interesting new compound classes, such as P 2 B 2 heterocycles,, borenium ions,, , and boron‐centered radicals .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of aminoboranes [9][10][11] and phosphinoboranes [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] have been assembled in the peri positions of (ace-)naphthyl scaffolds, which hold the Lewis acid and the Lewis base in close proximity. Besides their relevance for frustrated Lewis pair chemistry, some of the functionalized (ace-)naphthylphosphinoboranes have been the starting point for the synthesis of interesting new compound classes, such as P 2 B 2 heterocycles, [12,16] borenium ions, [18,20,21] and boron-centered radicals. [19] A selection of these peri-substituted (ace-)naphthylaminoboranes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) and (ace-)naphthylphosphinoboranes (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) are shown in Schemes 1 and 2.…”
Four peri‐substituted acenaphthylphosphinoboranes 5‐Ph2P‐Ace‐6‐BRR′ (R = R′ = H; R = H, R′ = C6F5; R = Cl, R′ = C6F5; R = R′ = C6F5), possessing functionality at the B atoms, were prepared and fully characterized. A quantum‐chemical analysis of these and previously known (ace‐)naphthylaminoboranes and (ace‐)naphthylphosphinoboranes revealed that these compound classes can be divided into three subclasses, namely: regular Lewis pairs (LPs) with predominately attractive peri interactions; frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) with predominately repulsive peri interactions; and regular Lewis pairs with predominately repulsive peri interactions. The latter subclass is a straightforward example of the enforced proximity donor concept. A detailed bond analysis showed no principal difference between attractive and enforced B–P bonds in (ace‐)naphthylphosphinoboranes.
“…[31] Interestingly, the topological bond analysis revealed no principal difference between attractive and enforced B-P bonds in (ace-)naphthylphosphinoboranes. The new acenaphthylphosphinoboranes 13-16, bearing functionality at the B atom, might be of interest as starting materials for the synthesis of compound classes, such as P 2 B 2 heterocycles, [12,16] borenium ions, [18,20,21] and boron-centered radicals. [19] Experimental Section General: Reagents were obtained commercially (Sigma-Aldrich, Germany) and were used as received.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The balance between the forces is usually achieved by the judicious choice of the substituents, which contribute both via their electronic nature, as well as their steric bulk. In recent years, a number of aminoboranes and phosphinoboranes have been assembled in the peri positions of (ace‐)naphthyl scaffolds, which hold the Lewis acid and the Lewis base in close proximity. Besides their relevance for frustrated Lewis pair chemistry, some of the functionalized (ace‐)naphthylphosphinoboranes have been the starting point for the synthesis of interesting new compound classes, such as P 2 B 2 heterocycles,, borenium ions,, , and boron‐centered radicals .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, a number of aminoboranes [9][10][11] and phosphinoboranes [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] have been assembled in the peri positions of (ace-)naphthyl scaffolds, which hold the Lewis acid and the Lewis base in close proximity. Besides their relevance for frustrated Lewis pair chemistry, some of the functionalized (ace-)naphthylphosphinoboranes have been the starting point for the synthesis of interesting new compound classes, such as P 2 B 2 heterocycles, [12,16] borenium ions, [18,20,21] and boron-centered radicals. [19] A selection of these peri-substituted (ace-)naphthylaminoboranes (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6) and (ace-)naphthylphosphinoboranes (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12) are shown in Schemes 1 and 2.…”
Four peri‐substituted acenaphthylphosphinoboranes 5‐Ph2P‐Ace‐6‐BRR′ (R = R′ = H; R = H, R′ = C6F5; R = Cl, R′ = C6F5; R = R′ = C6F5), possessing functionality at the B atoms, were prepared and fully characterized. A quantum‐chemical analysis of these and previously known (ace‐)naphthylaminoboranes and (ace‐)naphthylphosphinoboranes revealed that these compound classes can be divided into three subclasses, namely: regular Lewis pairs (LPs) with predominately attractive peri interactions; frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs) with predominately repulsive peri interactions; and regular Lewis pairs with predominately repulsive peri interactions. The latter subclass is a straightforward example of the enforced proximity donor concept. A detailed bond analysis showed no principal difference between attractive and enforced B–P bonds in (ace‐)naphthylphosphinoboranes.
“…The exploitation of frustrated Lewis pairs (FLPs), for the capture and activation of small unreactive molecules, such as dihydrogen and carbon dioxide, marks a paradigm change in the field of catalysis. Single component FLPs (and related regular Lewis pairs) based on phosphinoboranes mounted on rigid peri ‐substituted aromatic scaffolds, such as naphthalene, acenaphthene, dimethylxanthene, and dibenzofurane (Scheme ), may offer two potential advantages over conventional two component FLP systems: (i) Firstly, the rigid scaffolds allow tuning of the donor acceptor distances, which for high catalytic activity needs to be in the range between approximately 3 Å and 5 Å . (ii) Secondly, the entropy penalty associated with the capture of small molecules should be considerably smaller in single component FLPs than in two component FLPs , .…”
Starting from 1,8‐dibromo‐biphenylene, [1‐(bromo)biphenylen‐8‐yl]diphenylphosphine (1) and [1‐(diphenylphosphanyl)biphenylen‐8‐yl]dimesitylborane (2) were prepared by sequential metal / halide exchange and salt metathesis reactions. The phosphinoborane 2 comprises a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) mounted on a peri‐substituted biphenylene scaffold with a P···B distance of 4.100(3) Å. Attempts to capture dihydrogen and carbon dioxide failed, presumably due to the insufficient Lewis acidity of the dimesityl borane group. Compounds 1 and 2 were characterized by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy and X‐ray crystallography.
“…Our synthetic strategy begins with classical formation of neutral P-B adducts starting from lithiation of the 1-iodo-8-phosphinonaphthalene followed by trapping with a dibromoborane to furnish bromoboranes 61-63 with varying donating ability of the P centre (Scheme 18). [43][44][45] Notably, derivative 63 is a rare example of a stable and isolable phosphine-borane with an alkyl substituent on B. The cyclohexyl group is a weaker donor compared to Mes and previously described aromatic substituents.…”
The synthesis, structure, and reactivity of mixed group 13/group 15 compounds (E13 = B, Al, Ga, In, Tl; E15 = N, P, Sb, Bi) featuring a rigid (ace)naphthalene, biphenylene or (thio)xanthene backbone are discussed in this review.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.