2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.10.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amnesic shellfish poisoning (ASP) toxins in plankton and molluscs from Luanda Bay, Angola

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing four shellfish species, the lowest DA concentrations were determined in M. galloprovincialis, followed by A. noae , V. verrucosa and M. barbatus (Table ). Differences in DA accumulation among shellfish species have been reported previously (Vale & Sampayo ; Blanco et al ; Ujević et al ; Mafra et al ; Rijal Leblad et al ; Bouchouicha‐Smida et al ) and could be explained by reference to their different feeding mechanisms and toxin depuration rates (Mafra et al ). Interspecific differences in clearance rate and selective feeding during exposure to the toxic phytoplankton species has been reported (Leverone et al ; Mafra et al ; Skejić et al ), along with differences in toxin depuration rates (Douglas et al ; Blanco et al ; Mafra et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Comparing four shellfish species, the lowest DA concentrations were determined in M. galloprovincialis, followed by A. noae , V. verrucosa and M. barbatus (Table ). Differences in DA accumulation among shellfish species have been reported previously (Vale & Sampayo ; Blanco et al ; Ujević et al ; Mafra et al ; Rijal Leblad et al ; Bouchouicha‐Smida et al ) and could be explained by reference to their different feeding mechanisms and toxin depuration rates (Mafra et al ). Interspecific differences in clearance rate and selective feeding during exposure to the toxic phytoplankton species has been reported (Leverone et al ; Mafra et al ; Skejić et al ), along with differences in toxin depuration rates (Douglas et al ; Blanco et al ; Mafra et al ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…However they remained lower than in other natural ecosystems where they appeared to be harmful (e.g. 1401 pg DA mL −1 in Angola; Blanco et al, 2010), 8000 pg DA mL −1 in the Gulf of Mexico; (Macintyre et al, 2011). Since adverse effect of domoic acid oral exposure on sea bass has never been reported in the literature , and mussel biofiltration did not affect domoic acid concentrations, it is likely that ichtyotoxic effect in our experiment was negligible.…”
Section: Seawater Quality and Its Effects On Juvenile Sea Bass Growthmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Total DA concentrations measured during this study (max. 263 pg mL -1 ) were higher than several published values in the EEC-NS ecosystem (up to 7 pg mL -1 ; Downes-Tettmar et al 2013; Klein et al 2010) but remained lower than recent measurements in the Bay of Seine (1.4 ×10 3 pg mL -1 , Thorel et al 2017), and other ecosystems such as Monterey Bay (10×10 pg mL -1 ; Walz et al 1994), the Gulf of Mexico (3.3×10 3 pg mL -1 , Liefer et al 2013) or Luanda Bay, Angola (1.4×10 3 pg mL -1 , Blanco et al 2010).…”
Section: Domoic Acid Concentrations and Pseudo-nitzschia Speciesmentioning
confidence: 62%