2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Among-year and within-population variation in foraging distribution of European shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis over two decades: Implications for marine spatial planning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
63
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Two types of accelerometer and one type of GPS logger were used: M190L-D2GT (15 mm diameter, 53 mm length, 16 g in the (Table 1), supporting previous findings in this population (Bogdanova et al, 2014), we considered that our wind data were representative of the wind conditions experienced by all study individuals whilst on foraging trips. To make the wind data comparable across years, the data set from 2010 was sub-sampled at 5 min intervals.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Fieldwork And Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Two types of accelerometer and one type of GPS logger were used: M190L-D2GT (15 mm diameter, 53 mm length, 16 g in the (Table 1), supporting previous findings in this population (Bogdanova et al, 2014), we considered that our wind data were representative of the wind conditions experienced by all study individuals whilst on foraging trips. To make the wind data comparable across years, the data set from 2010 was sub-sampled at 5 min intervals.…”
Section: Materials and Methods Fieldwork And Instrumentssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Theory suggests that diet diversifies when predominant prey become scarce and/or lessen in profitability (Stephens & Krebs 1986), and empirical evidence in other seabird studies supports this (Croxall et al 1999, Cosolo et al 2011. Shags exploit a wide range of prey (Barrett 1991, Velando & Freire 1999, Lilliendahl & Solmundsson 2006, Cosolo et al 2011, Michelot et al 2017) and can adjust their foraging behaviour in response to a change in availability of different prey types within their foraging range (Wanless et al 1998, Daunt et al 2007, Bogdanova et al 2014, Michelot et al 2017. Changes in the availability of sandeels, non-sandeels or both may have contributed to the diet shift in our study population since many fish species have experienced changes in abundance and distribution in the N orth Sea linked to ocean warming (Perry et al 2005, Hiddink & ter Hofstede 2008, Heath et al 2012.…”
Section: Diet Trendsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Following Frederiksen et al (2004), we calculated the mean of February and March SST for an inshore area surrounding the Isle of May (bounded by ca. 56°0' to 56°4' N, and 2°7' to 2°3' W), overlapping with the summer foraging range of this population (Bogdanova et al 2014).…”
Section: Annual Sandeel Proxiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the data set includes several turtles that were re-tracked in successive nesting seasons, following [85], we quantified the inter-annual variation in core residence areas as (2a overlap /(a1 + a2), where a1 and a2 are the areas of the two respective 50% kernel contours and a overlap is the area of overlap.…”
Section: Delineation Of In-water Residence Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%