2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amorphous transformation of FeP enabling enhanced sulfur catalysis and anchoring in High-performance Li-S batteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…XPS was conducted on VOOH@CNTs before and after the absorption of Li 2 S 6 . The V 2p 1/2 and V 2p 3/2 peaks were found to shift to lower binding energies after the chemisorption of Li 2 S 6 (Figure b), indicating electron transfer from LiPSs to VOOH . Li–O and Li–O–H bonds were detected in the Li 1s spectrum of VOOH@CNTs after the absorption of Li 2 S 6 (Figure c), which can be ascribed to the interaction between VOOH and Li + in LiPSs via the Li–O bond .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…XPS was conducted on VOOH@CNTs before and after the absorption of Li 2 S 6 . The V 2p 1/2 and V 2p 3/2 peaks were found to shift to lower binding energies after the chemisorption of Li 2 S 6 (Figure b), indicating electron transfer from LiPSs to VOOH . Li–O and Li–O–H bonds were detected in the Li 1s spectrum of VOOH@CNTs after the absorption of Li 2 S 6 (Figure c), which can be ascribed to the interaction between VOOH and Li + in LiPSs via the Li–O bond .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The V 2p 1/2 and V 2p 3/2 peaks were found to shift to lower binding energies after the chemisorption of Li 2 S 6 (Figure 5b), indicating electron transfer from LiPSs to VOOH. 51 Li−O and Li−O−H bonds were detected in the Li 1s spectrum of VOOH@CNTs after the absorption of Li 2 S 6 (Figure 5c), which can be ascribed to the interaction between VOOH and Li + in LiPSs via the Li−O bond. 52 These two analyses suggest that VOOH can chemically anchor LiPSs via the V−S and Li− O bonds, thereby effectively suppressing the shuttle effect and improving cycling performance.…”
Section: Electrochemical Performancementioning
confidence: 93%
“…In addition to CoO, amorphous FeP also displays stronger polysulfide management ability than the corresponding crystalline state. [143] Overall, crystal structure regulation and amorphization control have exhibited great potential in enhancing the intrinsic activity of catalysts for MSBs. Notably, amorphous structures usually display high catalytic activity due to their disordered surface atoms.…”
Section: Crystal Phase Modulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[44] Metal phosphides, where the phosphors element exhibits high electronegativity, are also considered a promising PSRC to regulate polysulfide. [143,203] Furthermore, the convenient and low-cost synthetic process endows the metal phosphides with enormous potential as the cathode material applied in MSBs. [204] One of the first examples is synthesizing CoP nanoparticles with surface oxidation layers to enhance the interfacial polysulfide affinity.…”
Section: Metal Carbides Nitrides Borides and Phosphidesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conductive carbon-based materials are first introduced because they can physically restrict the shuttle of polysulfides through van der Waals forces between themselves and polysulfides while also improving the conductivity of the materials. However, the pure physical confinement cannot completely restrain the shuttle of LiPSs owing to weak polysulfide adsorption. Researchers have found that using the polar–polar interaction between transition metals and sulfur species to form chemical adsorption can better inhibit the shuttle of LiPSs. Nevertheless, the adsorbed polysulfides on the cathode side are deposited spontaneously due to the slow oxidation–reduction reaction kinetics between sulfur species. Once its concentration reaches a specific value, it will migrate to the anode side resulting from the concentration gradient diffusion, aggravating the shuttle effect, and resulting in active material loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%