“…Ideally, in this process, readers are made cognizant of the diverse language resources they leverage for text comprehension and, by extension, of the multiple identities they possess as skilled social actors in various communities of practice inside and outside of school. Following in the tradition of critical literacy approaches (e.g., Lewison, Leland, & Harste, 2015; Morrell, 2008; situated literacies: Barton et al, 2000; academic literacies: Lea & Street, 2006), we advocate for reading instruction that promotes critical rhetorical flexibility, or the skill to use language critically and flexibly for different purposes, in a variety of contexts, and with various audiences (Uccelli, Phillips Galloway, Aguilar, & Allen, 2020). This contrasts sharply with skills‐based views of academic language teaching that often fail to cultivate readers’ linguistic choice making by leaving unexamined the sociocultural facets of academic language comprehension and production.…”