1963
DOI: 10.1016/0013-4694(63)90176-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplitude changes of auditory potentials evoked at cochlear nucleus during acoustic habituation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter finding is consistent with earlier studies of primary sensory evoked responses (e. g. Hernandez-Peon et aI., 1956), but the fact that responses of all moda lities decrease during novel stimulation of any modality does not support the earlie r hypothesis that inputs of irrelevant modalities are suppre ssed, at 154 least for association responses. The absence of association response habituation to repeated click stimulation differs from earlier reports of evoked response habituation in the primary auditory system (Hernande z-Peon et aI., 1957) but is consistent with the negative findings of more recent studies (Worden & Marsh, 1963).…”
Section: Dlsl~usslonsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The latter finding is consistent with earlier studies of primary sensory evoked responses (e. g. Hernandez-Peon et aI., 1956), but the fact that responses of all moda lities decrease during novel stimulation of any modality does not support the earlie r hypothesis that inputs of irrelevant modalities are suppre ssed, at 154 least for association responses. The absence of association response habituation to repeated click stimulation differs from earlier reports of evoked response habituation in the primary auditory system (Hernande z-Peon et aI., 1957) but is consistent with the negative findings of more recent studies (Worden & Marsh, 1963).…”
Section: Dlsl~usslonsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Contractions of middle-ear muscles have been implicated in some studies of auditory evoked response habituation (Guzman-Flores, Alcaraz, & Harmony, 1960;Hugelin, Dumont, & Paillas, 1960), but denied by other workers (Altman, 1960;Moushegan, Rupert, Marsh, & Galambos, 1961). Further discussion of methodological problems is given in the careful studies by Marsh et al (1962) and Worden and Marsh (1963). (See also the discussion by Deutsch, 1962.…”
Section: Sensory Evoked Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Worden and Marsh (1963) have emphasized the importance of controlling stimulus intensity, demonstrating statistically reliable changes in response, and conducting other necessary control procedures which were not always observed in the studies listed above. Experiments satisfying all these methodological criteria have not, for the most part, found any consistent or significant evidence of habituation of auditory evoked responses in the waking animal (Huttenlocher, 1960;Marsh, McCarthy, Sheatz, & Galambos, 1961;Sharpless & Jasper, 1956;Worden & Marsh, 1963). However Marsh and Worden (1964) have recently reported decreases in clickevoked response amplitudes from the auditory cortex when the EEG was desynchronized, even in the absence of any consistent response changes at the cochlear nucleus.…”
Section: Sensory Evoked Potentialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Careful studies by Worden and associates (see Worden and Marsh, 1963; Marsh, Worden, and Hicks, 1962) demonstrated that click evoked responses at the cochlear nucleus do not show habituation. Instead, amplitudes of responses at this first relay nucleus in the auditory system are rigidly controlled by the physical properties of the sound stimulus.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%