Monitoring the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty: Seismic Event Discrimination and Identification 2002
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8169-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amplitude Corrections for Regional Seismic Discriminants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
31
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The beginning of the Lg window is defined by the analyst pick, or when a pick is not available, the group velocity 3.45 km/s. The end of the window is defined by the group velocity 2.8 km/s, and the minimum window length is 1 s. These windows are used to measure time-domain root-mean-squares amplitudes, which are converted to pseudo-spectral amplitudes in the passband of 1-2 Hz via the method of TAYLOR et al (2002). Amplitudes are kept if the pre-event signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) exceeds two.…”
Section: Data Set and Attenuation Tomography Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The beginning of the Lg window is defined by the analyst pick, or when a pick is not available, the group velocity 3.45 km/s. The end of the window is defined by the group velocity 2.8 km/s, and the minimum window length is 1 s. These windows are used to measure time-domain root-mean-squares amplitudes, which are converted to pseudo-spectral amplitudes in the passband of 1-2 Hz via the method of TAYLOR et al (2002). Amplitudes are kept if the pre-event signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) exceeds two.…”
Section: Data Set and Attenuation Tomography Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local and regional distance attenuation of seismic phases is important in earthquake hazard prediction. Quantifying seismic wave attenuation and correcting for its effects improves source parameter studies, which will aid in discrimination of small nuclear tests from naturally occurring earthquakes (e.g., BAKER et al, 2004;MAYEDA et al, 2003;TAYLOR et al, 2002). Current event identification relies on Q models to remove propagation effects, revealing source differences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of these conclusions, seismologists commonly use a frequency-independent power-law model to approximate P n geometric spreading in the real Earth when analyzing observed data (e.g., Sereno et al, 1988;Zhu et al, 1991;Taylor et al, 2002). Occasionally, researchers combine P n geometric spreading and attenuation into a single distance-decay term in order to avoid the difficulty of isolating P n geometric-spreading effects (e.g., Chun et al, 1989;Tinker and Wallace, 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Occasionally, researchers combine P n geometric spreading and attenuation into a single distance-decay term in order to avoid the difficulty of isolating P n geometric-spreading effects (e.g., Chun et al, 1989;Tinker and Wallace, 1997). Because of the apparent incompatibility between the behavior of P n in the real Earth and its power-law geometric-spreading representation, Taylor et al (2002) postulated that the use of a frequency-independent power-law spreading model might be the reason for difficulties encountered in fitting the P n spectra in their study. The common practice of representing P n geometric spreading in the real Earth with a frequency-independent power-law model may simply be a choice of convenience due to the unavailability of a more accurate, easy-to-use, frequency-dependent P n geometric-spreading model, even for a simple reference velocity structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Walter et al, 1995;Taylor, 1996;Hartse et al, 1997;Kim et al, 1997;Rodgers and Walter, 2002;Taylor et al, 2002;Bottone et al, 2002;Walter et al, 2007). The application of this discriminant to broad regions, however, has been hampered by large variations in the amplitudes of phases due to propagation effects in the crust and upper mantle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%