1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0091-3057(96)00168-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Amylin and Food Intake in Mice: Effects on Motivation to Eat and Mechanism of Action

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
21
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
21
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are contradicting to previous studies showing that sCT decreases lever pressing for palatable reward (Morley et al 1997) and palatable food intake in mice (Eiden et al 2002). However, either these studies used high doses of amylin in the range of 100 to 200 μg/kg in an operant paradigm (Morley et al 1997), or they were conducted in mice resistant to leptin after being scheduled on chocolate as a highly caloric substitute to chow for more than 40 days (Eiden et al 2002). Another difference is that our experiments were conducted in novel cages; thus, novelty could be considered as a factor potentially influencing our data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are contradicting to previous studies showing that sCT decreases lever pressing for palatable reward (Morley et al 1997) and palatable food intake in mice (Eiden et al 2002). However, either these studies used high doses of amylin in the range of 100 to 200 μg/kg in an operant paradigm (Morley et al 1997), or they were conducted in mice resistant to leptin after being scheduled on chocolate as a highly caloric substitute to chow for more than 40 days (Eiden et al 2002). Another difference is that our experiments were conducted in novel cages; thus, novelty could be considered as a factor potentially influencing our data.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of amylin in reducing meal size is dose dependent and the effect is effectively and specifically blocked by amylin antagonism; on the other hand, amylin antagonists alone increase eating by a meal size effect (Mollet et al, 2004). Importantly, amylin and its analogs reduce meal size without producing signs of conditioned taste aversion or visceral illness (Lutz et al, 1995b;Morley et al, 1997;Mack et al, 2007Mack et al, , 2010. Overall, the data indicate that amylin acts as a physiologic short-term satiating hormone in rats.…”
Section: A Amylin As a Satiation Signalmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Peripheral administration decreases food intake, 8 and among systemically administered anorexigenic molecules (amylin, salmon calcitonin, peptide YY 3-36, cholecystokinin-8, glucagon-like peptide-1, CGRP, adrenomedullin, leptin, the melanocortin agonist MTII, the cannabinoid receptor antagonist AM251 and naloxone), amylin receptor agonism demonstrates the greatest potency to inhibit consumption. 9 Amylin suppresses food intake by reducing meal size, 10,11 while having no effect on conditioned taste aversion, 12,13 kaolin consumption (a preclinical marker of emesis), 11 or locomotor activity, 11 suggesting a direct effect of the hormone on metabolic pathways. Amylin's action is mediated by activation of amylin-binding sites in the area postrema (AP) as lesioning this site abolishes its ability to reduce food intake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%