2009
DOI: 10.1109/tmtt.2009.2014449
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An 18-mW 1.175–2-GHz Frequency Synthesizer With Constant Bandwidth for DVB-T Tuners

Abstract: A fully integrated 1.175-2-GHz differentially tuned frequency synthesizer aimed for digital video broadcasting-terrestrial tuners is implemented in a 0.18-m CMOS process. To maintain phase-noise optimization and loop stability over the entire output frequency range, techniques of constant loop bandwidth are proposed. The voltage-controlled oscillator gain VCO and band step res are both maintained by simultaneously adjusting the sizes of switched capacitors and varactors. Charge pump current CP is programmed to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the simulated Q factor of varactors in the proposed VCO and conventional varactors in Ref. [6]. The varators are switched on and controlled by V ctrl .…”
Section: Vcomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 shows the simulated Q factor of varactors in the proposed VCO and conventional varactors in Ref. [6]. The varators are switched on and controlled by V ctrl .…”
Section: Vcomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] The LC-PLLs show superior phase-noise performance at the cost of large area. LC oscillators need a multiple-switched-capacitors array [14][15][16] and auto-frequency calibration (AFC) [17][18][19] techniques to expand the tuning range, which raise the design complexity of the PLL. The RPLL is more attractive than the LC-PLL for SoC applications because it has the advantages of small area and large tuning range, but the phase noise is much worse than that of the LC-PLL, and may greatly degrade the jitter performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [10,11] solve this problem by adding a selfcontrolled varactor array. Reference [12] uses 16 tuning curves to achieve constant K VCO and f step , but it relies on an arbitrary scaling capacitor array, which makes this method hard to extend to more curves. Reference [13] provides a pseudoexponential capacitor array method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on Refs. [9][10][11][12][13], the VCO of this work employs 128 tuning curves to cover a range of 1.4-2.2 GHz, nearly a 44.4% tuning range. Besides, a selfcontrolled varactor array is added in the VCO to compensate for variation of K VCO and f step .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%