2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2015.07.110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An a priori DNS subgrid analysis of the presumed β-PDF model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, recall that Eq. ( 1) is commonly applied solely to evaluating the source term 6 C in the transport equation for ̃ [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], whereas mean concentrations of various species are calculated using Eq. (2).…”
Section: Accordingly Any Pdf That Is Based On the Actual Values Of ̅ And Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, recall that Eq. ( 1) is commonly applied solely to evaluating the source term 6 C in the transport equation for ̃ [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], whereas mean concentrations of various species are calculated using Eq. (2).…”
Section: Accordingly Any Pdf That Is Based On the Actual Values Of ̅ And Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the wide use of the flamelet concept coupled with a presumed PDF [10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32], such an approach requires further study. In particular, its validation has been mainly performed in a posteriori RANS [15,17,22] or LES studies [16,[18][19][20][21]23,24,27,28,[30][31][32], with the reported results showing limited capabilities of the approach for predicting mean concentrations of intermediate species such as H2 (in hydrocarbon-air flames), CO, OH, or CH2O (see Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In FLUENT, we used the default Custom law to achieve these processes. We used the β-PDF model 30 to calculate the effects of combustion component fluctuation; coke combustion uses a power/diffusion model; the volatile precipitation model adopts the chemical percolation devolatilization (CPD) model; 31 for the volatile composition required in the cracking process, please refer to the literature; 32 the soot generation is presented in the following sections.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, evidence shows that there is a noticeable gap between the most widely used PDFs and the actual direct numerical simulation (DNS) data [14]. Then, an investigation on the applicability of the presumed β− PDF approach to modeling of turbulent flames was carried out by a comparison between the DNS data and the corresponding a priori large eddy simulation [15]. The results show that mean and variance are not sufficient as control parameters by means of presumed PDF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%