2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.cam.2012.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An accurate finite-difference method for ablation-type Stefan problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…10. See also the related experimental paper [71] VI. DISCUSSION Our proposed model indicates that the NIC design is located near a performance cliff, a conclusion consistent with NIF/NIC experimental data.…”
Section: Combined Effects: Ablation and Dt To Ch Rt Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10. See also the related experimental paper [71] VI. DISCUSSION Our proposed model indicates that the NIC design is located near a performance cliff, a conclusion consistent with NIF/NIC experimental data.…”
Section: Combined Effects: Ablation and Dt To Ch Rt Instabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first concerns the formal accuracy of the numerical scheme used to solve the governing equations; this appears never to have been considered. It turns out to be of relevance in view of our recent work using the formally second-order accurate Keller Box finite-difference method for moving boundary problems, where we showed that the actual accuracy of a numerical scheme decreases if inconsistencies between initial and boundary conditions are not treated correctly [23][24][25]; indeed, this is exactly what happens in the oxygen diffusion problem. The second aspect that we consider is the actual value of the time, t e , at which the oxygen is depleted; we shall call this quantity the extinction time, in line with other physical situations where a domain that is initially of finite extent vanishes after a finite time [26][27][28][29][30][31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, as explained in [23][24][25], consistency is important because it has an effect on the accuracy of the numerical scheme that is used; from this point of view, it is advantageous to apply a scheme to a formulation where both the dependent variable and its spatial derivative are consistent at both (0,0) and (1,0). A natural first step towards achieving this is to define a new dependent variable, u, given by…”
Section: Transformations Leading To a Consistent Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The above equations were then solved numerically using the Keller box finite-difference method, whose implementation for this type of initially degenerate moving-boundary problem has been documented elsewhere (see [23,24]); all definite integrals that arise in the formulation were computed using the trapezoidal rule. The results of the numerical simulations are shown and discussed in Section 4.…”
Section: Model Equations For Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%