2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2011.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An active debris removal parametric study for LEO environment remediation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
139
0
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 285 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
139
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The study by Liou and Johnson [1] indicated that the LEO debris population has reached a point where the environment was unstable and random collision would force the LEO population to increase even without any future launches. Currently-adopted mitigation measures, such as limiting postmission orbital lifetime to less than 25 years, are insufficient to stabilize the future LEO debris environment [2,3]. In addition to mitigation measures, the active removal of non-operating spacecraft, as well as rocket bodies, will be mandatory avoiding proliferation of space debris [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Liou and Johnson [1] indicated that the LEO debris population has reached a point where the environment was unstable and random collision would force the LEO population to increase even without any future launches. Currently-adopted mitigation measures, such as limiting postmission orbital lifetime to less than 25 years, are insufficient to stabilize the future LEO debris environment [2,3]. In addition to mitigation measures, the active removal of non-operating spacecraft, as well as rocket bodies, will be mandatory avoiding proliferation of space debris [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rocket bodies), or when the satellites themselves reach the end of their useful life [1], [3]. Such debris present an ever-increasing risk to satellites and other spacecraft, as highlighted in 2009 by the high-velocity collision between the then operational Iridium 33 and the inactive Kosmos 2251 satellites [3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent computer modelling studies have suggested that the LEO debris population may be stabilised at current levels through the removal of five large, intact objects per year [14]. Whilst this approach can only be successful if the objects that are targeted would otherwise contribute to future collision activity, it does provide a more cost-effective approach to remediation than the removal, en masse, of all debris objects.…”
Section: A Cloud-based Architecture Solution To the Ssa Case Studymentioning
confidence: 99%