Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction 2002
DOI: 10.1145/572020.572028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An activity theory approach to affordance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
87
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
87
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…One research stream has propagated a canonical view, assuming that primarily social conventions determine the meanings and existences of affordances (Barentsen & Trettvik, 2002;Bertelsen, 2006). For example, the affordance of a keyboard is for typing.…”
Section: Affordances and Niches As Ways Of Studying The End-user Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One research stream has propagated a canonical view, assuming that primarily social conventions determine the meanings and existences of affordances (Barentsen & Trettvik, 2002;Bertelsen, 2006). For example, the affordance of a keyboard is for typing.…”
Section: Affordances and Niches As Ways Of Studying The End-user Viewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have argued that the notion of instrumental technology affordances of [18] is "operational" in the sense that the notion of deficiency or breakdown of various components of an affordance, and the consequences, is much more clearly elucidated than in much of the early literature; however, work in activity theory, notably [2,1], while taking its inspiration in work closely aligned with [18], could conceivably be used to perform a structured study of the concept and implications of brokenness of affordances. Similarly, recent attempts to give detailed accounts of cognition in interaction with technology could be used for a similar purpose [28], as may more finegrained analyses of the roles of signifiers and feedback [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, objects with broken affordances may afford repurposing, to be used for something else or having some of its affordances that were already there take the foreground, even though they were not what the object was originally produced for, as already remarked by Baerentsen and Trettvik [2]. For example, an old CRT TV with a broken screen may be used as a table, or a polystyrene packing box cracked in two may be used as two bathtub toys.…”
Section: The Affordances Of Objects With Broken Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, using Activity Theory, Bødker (1991) describes three complementary distinctions in human-tool interaction that exist at a physical artifact level, the subject/object level where humans are acting through the artifact, and handling of interfaces of the artifact. Similar, Baerentsen and Trettvik (2002) argued that using Activity as a unit of analysis for Human-Computer Interaction can greatly help to understand affordances as within the context of their socio-cultural influence and perceive them not as fixed instances of reality but as dynamic evolving properties of artifacts that are embedded in context and environment. Through learning and the use of signs and symbols, human agency can adopt, use and appropriate artifacts through their culturally-specific affordances.…”
Section: Social Affordancesmentioning
confidence: 99%