2000 IEEE International Solid-State Circuits Conference. Digest of Technical Papers (Cat. No.00CH37056)
DOI: 10.1109/isscc.2000.839725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive 2.4 GHz low-IF receiver in 0.6 μm CMOS for wideband wireless LAN

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…al. reported a double-IF receiver in 0.6um CMOS for Wireless LAN applications [3]. Table 2 lists its results of LNA and first mixer.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…al. reported a double-IF receiver in 0.6um CMOS for Wireless LAN applications [3]. Table 2 lists its results of LNA and first mixer.…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the introduction of 2.4GHz ISM band for custom wireless data-link applications, research on monolithic transceiver for different applications within this band is becoming hotter and hotter [1] [2] [3]. CMOS transceiver, due to its lowest cost among all possible processes and highest integration ability with digital baseband sub-system for eventual one-chip whole system solution, has come into being the focusing research point in this area [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The gain and phase mismatches of the second IF signals depend only on the product of the relative errors of the first IF and the second local signals. This error reduction mechanism resembles the 4-phase double-conversion receiver [14,15], but the architecture is quite different. The final image-rejection ratio is mainly determined by the mismatches of RC values in the 3-phase complex filter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the residuals of IM1 at the filter output is determined by the mismatches of RC values in the complex filter. The RC mismatches can be reduced with careful-layout techniques [14,15] and the image rejection of more than 60 dB could be obtained [14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%