1996
DOI: 10.1109/42.481441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement filter for mammographic breast mass detection

Abstract: Presents a novel approach for segmentation of suspicious mass regions in digitized mammograms using a new adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement (DWCE) filter in conjunction with Laplacian-Gaussian (LG) edge detection. The DWCE enhances structures within the digitized mammogram so that a simple edge detection algorithm can be used to define the boundaries of the objects. Once the object boundaries are known, morphological features are extracted and used by a classification algorithm to differentiate re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
91
0
7

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
91
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Fo r instance, at a sp ecificity of 1 FP/im age a true-posi tive fraction of only 30 % is reported by N ishikaw a et al [24] fo r masses w ith diam eters between 8 and 14 mm. S im ila r results w ere obtained by P e trick et al [26] for masses o f unknown size. F o r stellate lesions and m icro calcificatio n clusters the sensitivity is approxi m ately 9 0 % at the same specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fo r instance, at a sp ecificity of 1 FP/im age a true-posi tive fraction of only 30 % is reported by N ishikaw a et al [24] fo r masses w ith diam eters between 8 and 14 mm. S im ila r results w ere obtained by P e trick et al [26] for masses o f unknown size. F o r stellate lesions and m icro calcificatio n clusters the sensitivity is approxi m ately 9 0 % at the same specificity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…O n a test set of 12 images showing an irregular mass their method co rrectly labeled the mass in 8 cases, but no false-positive rate was reported. F in a lly , in a recent study P e trick et al [26] suggest the use of a new contrast enhancement filte r fo llo w ed by edge detection to gener ate target signals, w hich are then classified by a statisti cal or neural netw ork classifier.…”
Section: Detection Of Massesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main purpose of circularity is to show the circular degree of masses [25]. The higher the circularity is, the more circular the object tends to be.…”
Section: Circularitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tested on a small database, a difference in the training and testing results was found. Petrick et al [21] obtained potential masses using an adaptive density-weighted contrast enhancement (DWCE) filter and LaplacianGaussian (LG) edge detection. Then morphological features were extracted and input to a classifier to differentiate normal ROIs and mass ROIs.…”
Section: Mass Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%