2010 International Conference on Networking and Digital Society 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icnds.2010.5479338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An Adaptive Forward Error Control Method for Voice Communication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering that the primary objective of FEC is to reduce packet loss as perceived by application, packet loss rate (Ppl) after reconstruction was used to decide the required redundancy level in seminal works, such as Bolot and Vega-García [1996], and in later works, such as Johansson et al [2002] and Lizhong et al [2010]. However, Padhye et al [2000] warn that packet loss "may not be representative under all network conditions," such as during burst losses, when many consecutive packets are lost.…”
Section: Forward Error Correction (Fec) Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering that the primary objective of FEC is to reduce packet loss as perceived by application, packet loss rate (Ppl) after reconstruction was used to decide the required redundancy level in seminal works, such as Bolot and Vega-García [1996], and in later works, such as Johansson et al [2002] and Lizhong et al [2010]. However, Padhye et al [2000] warn that packet loss "may not be representative under all network conditions," such as during burst losses, when many consecutive packets are lost.…”
Section: Forward Error Correction (Fec) Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ses iletiminde SNR değerinin düşük olması, hem ses kalitesini hem de haberleşme menzilini negatif yönde etkilemektedir. FEC koruması altındaki veriler gürültülü ortamlarda bozularak iletilse dahi kullanılan FEC tarafından düzeltilerek kayıplar engellenebilir [9]. Dolayısıyla FEC optimizasyonu, paket kayıplarını azaltmada ve ses kalitesini arttırmada büyük önem arz etmektedir [10,11].…”
Section: Gi̇ri̇ş (Introduction)unclassified
“…These methods are typically classified into either sender-based schemes or receiver-based schemes. Senderbased schemes consist of a collection of packet loss protection methods that provide error-robust transmission methods such as interleaving, forward error correction (FEC), and redundant speech transmission (RST) [8][9][10][11][12]. On the other hand, receiver-based schemes consist of a collection of packet loss concealment (PLC) methods that compensate for lost speech signals using substitutable signals, for example, silence, previous good speech, or regenerated speech according to the analysis-by-synthesis criterion [13][14][15][16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%