2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-019-04326-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

An adaptive PID control algorithm for the two-legged robot walking on a slope

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the time required to stabilize the error is 5 seconds for PID and fuzzy logic controller and 0 seconds for the sliding mode controller. The result indicates that the performance of SMC is greater than the PID and fuzzy logic controller (Mandava and Vundavilli, 2020;Mandava and Vundavilli, 2021;Kodali et al, 2022). Figure 6 shows the switching surfaces of the SMC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the time required to stabilize the error is 5 seconds for PID and fuzzy logic controller and 0 seconds for the sliding mode controller. The result indicates that the performance of SMC is greater than the PID and fuzzy logic controller (Mandava and Vundavilli, 2020;Mandava and Vundavilli, 2021;Kodali et al, 2022). Figure 6 shows the switching surfaces of the SMC.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ordinary open-loop pose control strategies [1][2][3] are difficult to meet the outdoor motion requirements of ground robots resulting from lacking accuracy. Most closed-loop position-posture control strategies are based on sensor feedback, such as using force sensor feedback [1,[8][9][10]14], attitude sensor feedback [11,13,15,16,18], and visual sensor feedback [19], but it is complicated to achieve the adjustment function in practice. is paper proposes a simple and effective position-posture control algorithm that does not require additional sensors and only modifies the inverse kinematics of the robot.…”
Section: Conclusion and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aoki et al developed a robot QRoSS, which completed rolling motion and position-posture control by stretching and contracting the legs [13]. Mandava and Vundavilli developed an adaptive torque-based PID controller with the help of MCIWO-NN and PSO-NN algorithms to transform position-posture [14]. Corral et al changed the settings of a hexapod robot leg trajectory for adjusting posture-position by optimizing consumed energy and leg trajectory during each leg transfer [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With f (x) defined as in (11), the various constants remain like α 1 = 1, α 2 = √ n, α 3 = 1 and α 4 = 1, [16]. By considering the robot manipulator equation described in (1), and the control equation defined in (10), we defined the closed loop system equation:…”
Section: Control Lawmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], an adaptive PID control for wind turbines was developed, which allows an automatic change of gains with no trial-and-error processes. In [11], the principal aim was to decide the gains of the torque-based PID controller with the help of a neural network trained by using nature-inspired optimization algorithms. The adaptiveness of the algorithm lies in modifying the gains of the controller based on the magnitude of the error in the angular displacement received at the input.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%